Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite In Re Pinal County Mental Health No. Mh-201000029, 240 P.3d 1262.
- In RE TERM OF PARENTAL RIGHTS AS TO V.M. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
-
In RE TERM OF PARENTAL RIGHTS AS TO V.M.
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
Mental Health No. MH-201000029, ¶ 20 (App. 2010), superseded by statute on other grounds, as recognized in In re Pima Cnty.
- In Re Mh2015-002490 422 P.3d 1043 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
-
In Re Mh2015-002490
422 P.3d 1043
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
No. MH-201000029, ¶ 6 (App. 2010) (citing Maricopa Cty.
- In Re Mh2015-003266 382 P.3d 72 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
-
In Re Mh2015-003266
382 P.3d 72
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
Mental Health No. MH-201000029, 503–04, 506, ¶¶ 9, 14–15, 21 (App. 2010).
- Tucson Estates Property Owners Association, Inc. v. McGovern, Sines 366 P.3d 111 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
-
Tucson Estates Property Owners Association, Inc. v. McGovern, Sines
366 P.3d 111
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
Mental Health No. MH-201000029, (“[T]his court is not free to amend the unambiguous language of our statutes to conform to our own notions of public policy.”).
- In Re Mh2014-002674 358 P.3d 609 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
-
In Re Mh2014-002674
358 P.3d 609
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Mental Health No. MH-201000029, ¶ 5, (stating that a lack of strict compliance makes the proceedings void).
- In Re PIMA COUNTY MENTAL HEALTH NO. MH20130801 347 P.3d 598 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
-
In Re PIMA COUNTY MENTAL HEALTH NO. MH20130801
347 P.3d 598
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
Mental Health No. MH-201000029
- Steven Lane Fuller v. State of Arizona 314 P.3d 814 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
-
Steven Lane Fuller v. State of Arizona
314 P.3d 814
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
Mental Health No. MH-201000029
- In Re Mh2011-000914 275 P.3d 611 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
-
In Re Mh2011-000914
275 P.3d 611
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2012
(citing In re MH 2006-000490, ¶ 10 , , 390 (App.2007)); see also In re MH-201000029, ¶ 5 , rev. denied (Apr.
- Fogliano v. BRAIN EX REL. CTY. OF MARICOPA 270 P.3d 839 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
-
Fogliano v. BRAIN EX REL. CTY. OF MARICOPA
270 P.3d 839
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
Mental Health No. MH-201000029, , 504 n. 4, ¶ 15, , 1266 n. 4 (App.2010) (“In the absence of a statutory definition, a dictionary may be consulted to determine the ordinary meaning of words used in a statute.”).
- Cohen v. Maricopa County 263 P.3d 61 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
-
Cohen v. Maricopa County
263 P.3d 61
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
For a comprehensive discussion of the Mental Health Services Act and the duties imposed by the Act on the State, its counties, and independent contractors, see Arnold v. Ariz. Dep’t of Health Servs., -600 , -28 (1989) and In re Pinal County Mental Health No. MH-201000029, -04, ¶¶ 12-14 , -66 (App. 2010).
- State Ex Rel. Horne v. Autozone, Inc. 258 P.3d 289 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
-
State Ex Rel. Horne v. Autozone, Inc.
258 P.3d 289
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
Mental Health No. MH-201000029, , 504 n.4, ¶ 15, , 1266 n.4 (App.2010) (“In the absence of a statutory definition, a dictionary may be consulted to determine the ordinary meaning of words used in a statute.”).
- Estate of Maudsley v. Meta Services, Inc. 258 P.3d 248 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
-
Estate of Maudsley v. Meta Services, Inc.
258 P.3d 248
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
Mental Health No. MH-201000029, ¶ 13 , (“The new law implemented a package of reforms aimed at clarifying and enforcing patients’ rights, preventing involuntary psycho-surgeries, and generally protecting patients from abuse and medical neglect.” (footnotes omitted)).
- In Re Pinal County Mental Health No. Mh-201000076 244 P.3d 568 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
-
In Re Pinal County Mental Health No. Mh-201000076
244 P.3d 568
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2010
¶ 4 In In re Pinal County Mental Health No. MH-201000029, , this court determined “[t]ogether, §§ 36-533(B) and 36-501(14) require that two physicians must each personally conduct a ‘complete physical examination’ of the patient.” We concluded there that when one of the psychiatrists had conducted an examination remotely by a video confer