Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite Potter v. Vanderpool, 240 P.3d 1257.
-
Alex Paul Rasmussen v. State of Arizona
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
¶3 “Whether to accept special action jurisdiction is for this court to decide in the exercise of our discretion.”
- Jacob T. Osterkamp v. State of Arizona Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
-
Jacob T. Osterkamp v. State of Arizona
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
Actions 1; (appropriate to accept special action jurisdiction to review interlocutory order); cf. J.A.R.
- State of Arizona v. John David Franklin, Sr. & John David Franklin, Jr. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
-
State of Arizona v. John David Franklin, Sr. & John David Franklin, Jr.
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
See Potter v. Vanderpool, ___ Ariz. ___, ¶ 14, see also Ariz. R. P. Spec.
- William Allen Lear v. State of Arizona Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
- William Allen Lear v. State of Arizona Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011