Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State of Arizona v. Lee L.N., 340 P.3d 1085.

26 citing documents.

State of Arizona v. Hon. James Marner; Hanees Mohamed Haniffa 560 P.3d 338 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2024
State of Arizona v. Hon. James Marner; Hanees Mohamed Haniffa 560 P.3d 338 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2024
When the language of a statute is clear, “we need not look further to determine the statute’s meaning and apply its terms as written.” see also A.R.S.
State v. Sorensen 531 P.3d 378 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Sorensen 531 P.3d 378 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
“Only if the language is unclear or ambiguous do we employ principles of statutory construction to determine the [statute]’s intent.” ¶ 16 (App. 2014).
In Re Delinquency of A.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
In Re Delinquency of A.S. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Reed Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
State v. Reed Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2021
Instead, Reed’s conduct in selling heroin to the detectives constituted “the offense for which [Reed] was an accomplice.” ¶ 16 (App. 2014).
State v. Brock Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Brock Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Head Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Head Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
When the language of a statute is clear, “we need not look further to determine the statute’s meaning and apply its terms as written.” ¶ 16 (App. 2014).
State v. Lantz 430 P.3d 1262 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
State v. Lantz 430 P.3d 1262 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Lee , , 383, ¶ 16, , 1091 (App. 2014).
State v. Robles Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Robles Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
When the language of a statute is clear, “we need not look further to determine the statute’s meaning and apply its terms as written.” ¶ 16 (App. 2014).
Kimberly McLaughlin v. Suzan McLaughlin 382 P.3d 118 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
Kimberly McLaughlin v. Suzan McLaughlin 382 P.3d 118 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
“Our primary task in interpreting statutes is to give effect to the intent of the legislature.”
State v. Whitlock Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Whitlock Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
When the language of a statute is clear, “we need not look further to determine the statute’s meaning and apply its terms as written.” ¶ 16 (App. 2014).
In Re C.D. 377 P.3d 1034 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
In Re C.D. 377 P.3d 1034 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
EMILY ANN McGUIRE v. STATE OF ARIZONA Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
McGuire v. Lee ex rel. County of Pima 372 P.3d 328 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
McGuire v. Lee ex rel. County of Pima 372 P.3d 328 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
EMILY ANN McGUIRE v. STATE OF ARIZONA Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016