Cited by

¶ 8 (App. 2001) (finding waiver for failure to develop argument).

¶ 8 (App. 2001) (finding waiver for failure to develop argument).

¶ 8 (App. 2001) (citations omitted).

¶ 8 n.1 (2003); ¶ 14 (App. 2002) (“[E]xcept in cases involving ‘unlawful’ warrantless home entries, Arizona courts have not yet applied Article 2, Section 8 to grant broader protections against search and seizure than those available under the federal constitution.”); ¶ 8 (App. 2001) (waiving issue because defendant failed to develop argument on appeal).

¶ 16 n.4 (App. 2018) (); ¶ 8 (App. 2001) (finding waiver for failure to develop argument).

Although the failure to develop an argument can result in waiver, ¶ 8 (App. 2001), this court in its discretion will address the merits.

As a result, not only is Copple’s prejudice argument waived, ¶ 8 (App. 2001) (failure to develop an argument results in waiver), but his argument fails because prejudice cannot be shown by speculation, ¶ 15 (App. 2010).

¶ 101 n. 9 (2004) (“In Arizona, opening briefs must present significant arguments, supported by authority, setting forth an appellant’s position on the issues raised.”) (); ¶ 8 (App. 2001) (issue waived because defendant failed to develop argument in opening brief).

¶ 1 (2018) (“When a defendant fails to object to trial error, he forfeits appellate relief absent a showing of fundamental error”); ¶ 8 (App. 2001) (finding waiver for failure to develop argument).

on which the appellant relies.”); ¶ 101, n.9 (2004) (“In Arizona, opening briefs must present significant arguments, supported by authority, setting forth an appellant’s position on the issues raised.”) (); ¶ 8 (App. 2001) (issue waived because defendant failed to develop argument in his brief).

¶ 8 (App. 2001) (finding issue waived because defendant failed to develop argument in his brief).

–67, ¶ 11 (App. 2001) (newly discovered evidence is evidence that existed at time of trial, but not discovered until after trial).

See Moody, 208 Ariz. at 452 n.9, ¶ 101, 94 P.3d at 1147 n.9 (“In Arizona, opening briefs must present significant arguments, supported by authority, setting forth an appellant’s position on the issues raised.” (citation omitted)); ¶ 8, (concluding an issue was waived because the appellant failed to develop an argument in his brief).

(motion for reconsideration); (motion to suppress).

h citations to the authorities, statutes and parts of the record relied on.”); n.9, ¶ 101, n.9 (2004) (“In Arizona, opening briefs must present significant arguments, supported by authority, setting forth an appellant’s position on the issues raised.”) ( ); ¶ 8, (issue waived because defendant failed to develop argument in his brief).

-67, ¶ 11, -14 (App. 2001); (“Rule 32.1(e) has not expanded the law to relieve appellant from the consequences of a sentence because of facts arising after the judgment of conviction and sentencing.”).

¶ 8 , (issue waived because defendant failed to develop argument).

¶ 8 , (failing to develop due process argument on appeal waives the issue).