Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Sherron, 463 P.2d 533.
- State v. Hermanson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
- State v. Vasquez 807 P.2d 520 Ariz. 1991
-
State v. Vasquez
807 P.2d 520
Ariz. 1991
“To require that the police arrest everyone to whom they talk in the course of routine police duties would only serve to place an unwarranted burden on both the police and the citizens of the community.”
- State v. Johnson 710 P.2d 1050 Ariz. 1985
- State v. Johnson 710 P.2d 1050 Ariz. 1985
- State v. Galioto 613 P.2d 852 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
- State v. Galioto 613 P.2d 852 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
- State v. Lewis 589 P.2d 29 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
- State v. Lewis 589 P.2d 29 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
- State v. MacUmber 544 P.2d 1084 Ariz. 1976
- State v. MacUmber 544 P.2d 1084 Ariz. 1976
- State v. Jensen 531 P.2d 531 Ariz. 1975
- State v. Jensen 531 P.2d 531 Ariz. 1975
- State v. McDonald 526 P.2d 698 Ariz. 1974
-
State v. McDonald
526 P.2d 698
Ariz. 1974
Under the record in the instant case, there is nothing to show that the trial court abused this discretion or that the handcuffs were not removed as soon as safety would permit.” , -536 (1970).
- State v. Mayes 518 P.2d 568 Ariz. 1974
-
State v. Mayes
518 P.2d 568
Ariz. 1974
this Court held that the prosecution must prove consent by clear and positive evidence by showing unequivocal words or conduct expressing consent to the search; further in Sherron the Court stated: “Neither Miranda nor Orozco require that a police officer refrain from speaking to any citizen on the streets with
- State v. Bainch 505 P.2d 248 Ariz. 1973
- State v. Bainch 505 P.2d 248 Ariz. 1973
- State v. Damon 502 P.2d 1360 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
-
State v. Damon
502 P.2d 1360
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1972
543 (1925); and (3) consent, , cf. Bumper v. State of North Carolina, 391 U.S. 543 , 88 S.Ct.
- State v. Anderson 489 P.2d 722 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1971
- State v. Anderson 489 P.2d 722 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1971
- State v. Schindorff 484 P.2d 4 Ariz. 1971
-
State v. Schindorff
484 P.2d 4
Ariz. 1971
when speaking of constitutional rights under Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 , 86 S.Ct.
- State v. Hall 468 P.2d 598 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
- State v. Hall 468 P.2d 598 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1970
- State v. Linsner 467 P.2d 238 Ariz. 1970
- State v. Linsner 467 P.2d 238 Ariz. 1970