Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Johnson, 493 P.2d 498.

31 citing documents.

State of Arizona v. Brady Whitman, Jr. 324 P.3d 851 Ariz. 2014
State of Arizona v. Brady Whitman, Jr. 324 P.3d 851 Ariz. 2014
And until 1973, judgments were final once they had been both “orally pronounced by the court and entered in the minutes.” see also Ariz. R. Crim.
State of Arizona v. Brady Whitman Jr. 301 P.3d 226 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
State of Arizona v. Brady Whitman Jr. 301 P.3d 226 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
¶ 12 It has long been held that the oral pronouncement of a sentence controls over the minutes or written judgment, , , and that judgment and sentence are final upon oral pronouncement, with changes generally prohibited thereafter.
State v. Bolding 253 P.3d 279 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
State v. Bolding 253 P.3d 279 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
P. 26.16(a) (“The judgment of conviction and the sentence thereon are complete and valid as of the time of their oral pronouncement in open court.”); , (judgment complete after oral pronouncement and entry in minutes); , (acknowledging “as a general proposition, appeals are governed by statutes in effect at the time that judgments are entered”).
State of Arizona v. James Lewandowski Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
State of Arizona v. James Lewandowski Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
State v. Perez 836 P.2d 1000 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
State v. Perez 836 P.2d 1000 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
State v. Anderson 819 P.2d 967 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
State v. Anderson 819 P.2d 967 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
State v. Glasscock 812 P.2d 1083 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
State v. Glasscock 812 P.2d 1083 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
State v. Thomas 688 P.2d 1093 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
State v. Thomas 688 P.2d 1093 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
State v. Hanson 674 P.2d 850 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
State v. Hanson 674 P.2d 850 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
State v. Fayle 658 P.2d 218 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
State v. Fayle 658 P.2d 218 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
872 (1874), , held that the attempt to increase a punishment after the imposition of a valid sentence constitutes double jeopardy.
State v. Falkner 542 P.2d 404 Ariz. 1975
State v. Falkner 542 P.2d 404 Ariz. 1975
P.2d 357 (1962), cert, denied, 372 U.S. 920 , 83 S.Ct 735 (1963).
State v. James 519 P.2d 33 Ariz. 1974
State v. James 519 P.2d 33 Ariz. 1974
State v. Jefferson 503 P.2d 942 Ariz. 1972
State v. Rendel 501 P.2d 42 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
State v. Rendel 501 P.2d 42 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
State v. Wheeler 498 P.2d 205 Ariz. 1972
State v. Wheeler 498 P.2d 205 Ariz. 1972
we held that “a judgment is complete and valid when it is orally pronounced by the court and entered in the minutes.
State v. Jackson 494 P.2d 376 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
State v. Jackson 494 P.2d 376 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972