Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Quinones, 465 P.2d 360.

39 citing documents.

State v. Cheramie 189 P.3d 374 Ariz. 2008
State v. Cheramie 189 P.3d 374 Ariz. 2008
(requiring knowledge for possession); (citing Moreno with approval).
State v. Olea 897 P.2d 1371 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
State v. Murray 782 P.2d 329 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
State v. Murray 782 P.2d 329 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
State v. Ybarra 751 P.2d 591 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
State v. Ybarra 751 P.2d 591 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
State v. Murphy 570 P.2d 1070 Ariz. 1977
State v. Murphy 570 P.2d 1070 Ariz. 1977
State v. Urias, 8 Ariz.App.
State v. Donovan 568 P.2d 1107 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
State v. Donovan 568 P.2d 1107 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
State v. Valdez 562 P.2d 1368 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
State v. Valdez 562 P.2d 1368 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
State v. Miller 522 P.2d 23 Ariz. 1974
State v. Miller 522 P.2d 23 Ariz. 1974
State v. Webb 504 P.2d 1296 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1973
State v. Webb 504 P.2d 1296 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1973
State v. Ballinger 504 P.2d 955 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
State v. Ballinger 504 P.2d 955 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
State v. Arce, supra; accord, , State v. Riley, 12 Ariz.App.
State v. Villavicencio 502 P.2d 1337 Ariz. 1972
State v. Villavicencio 502 P.2d 1337 Ariz. 1972
State v. Washington 496 P.2d 633 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
State v. Washington 496 P.2d 633 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
Where, as here, the amount of narcotics involved is so small as not to be commonly understood to be a usable amount, , comes into play: "...
State v. Hays 496 P.2d 628 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
State v. Hays 496 P.2d 628 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
For example, , where the issue before us arose and was properly disposed of hy the trial judge.
State v. McGuire 493 P.2d 513 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
State v. McGuire 493 P.2d 513 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
Accord, , ; State v. Rios Payan, 15 Ariz.App.
State v. Laurino 492 P.2d 1189 Ariz. 1972
State v. Laurino 492 P.2d 1189 Ariz. 1972
State v. Rios Payan, 15 Ariz.App.
State v. Dixon 489 P.2d 225 Ariz. 1971
State v. Dixon 489 P.2d 225 Ariz. 1971
People v. Hill, 39 Ill.2d 125 , 233 N.E.2d 367 (1968).”
State v. Gilreath 487 P.2d 385 Ariz. 1971
State v. Gilreath 487 P.2d 385 Ariz. 1971
“Once a defendant is fully and fairly apprised of his rights, there is no requirement that warnings be repeated each time that questioning is commenced.” at 382 , at 362 and citations.
State v. Rios Payan 486 P.2d 808 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
State v. Rios Payan 486 P.2d 808 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
where possession of .36 milligrams of heroin was held sufficient.
State v. Martinez 485 P.2d 600 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
State v. Martinez 485 P.2d 600 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
State v. Urias, 8 Ariz.App.
State v. Arce 483 P.2d 1395 Ariz. 1971
State v. Arce 483 P.2d 1395 Ariz. 1971

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by