Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Deschamps, 468 P.2d 383.

46 citing documents.

State of Arizona v. Feliciano Ontiveros-Loya 352 P.3d 941 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
State of Arizona v. Feliciano Ontiveros-Loya 352 P.3d 941 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
State of Arizona v. Jill Irene Paris-Sheldon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
State of Arizona v. Jill Irene Paris-Sheldon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
at 328, 666 P.2d at 73; (“[T]he trial court must be given the opportunity to rule on the issue and correct possible errors .
State v. Millanes 885 P.2d 106 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
State v. Millanes 885 P.2d 106 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
State v. Soule 791 P.2d 1048 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
State v. Soule 791 P.2d 1048 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
United States v. Christopher, 488 F.2d 849 (9th Cir.1973)
State v. Gamez 696 P.2d 1327 Ariz. 1985
State v. Gamez 696 P.2d 1327 Ariz. 1985
State v. Gessler 690 P.2d 98 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
State v. Gessler 690 P.2d 98 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
State v. Petralia, supra
State v. Henley 687 P.2d 1220 Ariz. 1984
State v. Henley 687 P.2d 1220 Ariz. 1984
State v. Passarelli 636 P.2d 138 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
State v. Passarelli 636 P.2d 138 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
State v. Mulligan 613 P.2d 1266 Ariz. 1980
State v. Mulligan 613 P.2d 1266 Ariz. 1980
This evidence is generally excluded because it tends to draw the jury’s attention from the real issues on trial and to lead them unconsciously to render their verdicts in accordance with their view of defendant as a “bad man.”
State v. Mosley 581 P.2d 238 Ariz. 1978
State v. Mosley 581 P.2d 238 Ariz. 1978
State v. Powers 571 P.2d 1016 Ariz. 1977
State v. Powers 571 P.2d 1016 Ariz. 1977
State v. Swinburne 569 P.2d 833 Ariz. 1977
State v. Swinburne 569 P.2d 833 Ariz. 1977
State v. Adams 555 P.2d 358 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
State v. Adams 555 P.2d 358 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
State v. Babineaux 526 P.2d 1277 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
State v. Babineaux 526 P.2d 1277 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
State v. Parker 524 P.2d 506 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
State v. Parker 524 P.2d 506 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
State v. Tostado 523 P.2d 795 Ariz. 1974
State v. Tostado 523 P.2d 795 Ariz. 1974
State v. Jaramillo 522 P.2d 1079 Ariz. 1974
State v. Jaramillo 522 P.2d 1079 Ariz. 1974
State v. Petralia 521 P.2d 617 Ariz. 1974
State v. Petralia 521 P.2d 617 Ariz. 1974
Tryon v. Naegle 510 P.2d 768 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
Tryon v. Naegle 510 P.2d 768 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
“Claims of error will not be considered on appeal where the trial court has not been given the opportunity to rule on an issue so as to correct the possible errors.”
State v. Coward 496 P.2d 131 Ariz. 1972
State v. Coward 496 P.2d 131 Ariz. 1972
State v. Chudy 492 P.2d 402 Ariz. 1972
State v. Chudy 492 P.2d 402 Ariz. 1972
See State v. Boccelli, supra
State v. Tellez 486 P.2d 810 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
State v. Tellez 486 P.2d 810 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
824 , 17 L.Ed.2d 705 (1967)
State v. Ross 485 P.2d 810 Ariz. 1971
State v. Ross 485 P.2d 810 Ariz. 1971
824 , 17 L.Ed.2d 705 (1967); § 13-1598 A.R.S.; , , rehearing State v. Allen , ; State v. Hunt, 8 Ariz.App.