Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Endreson, 506 P.2d 248.

34 citing documents.

State v. Endreson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Endreson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Escobedo 213 P.3d 689 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
State v. Escobedo 213 P.3d 689 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
200 Ariz. at 565-66, ¶ 9 , 30 P.3d at 632-33 ; ¶ 111 , (“This court has long held that ‘a defendant who invited error at trial may not then assign the same as error on appeal.’” (-23 , -54 (1973))).
State v. Pandeli 161 P.3d 557 Ariz. 2007
State v. Pandeli 161 P.3d 557 Ariz. 2007
“This court has long held that ‘a defendant who invited error at trial may not then assign the same as error on appeal.’” Moody, 208 Ariz. at 453, ¶ 111, 94 P.3d at 1148 ( ).
State v. Moody 94 P.3d 1119 Ariz. 2004
State v. Moody 94 P.3d 1119 Ariz. 2004
This court has long held that “a defendant who invited error at trial may not then assign the same as error on appeal.” See, -23 , -54 (1973).
State v. Lindsey 720 P.2d 94 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
State v. Lindsey 720 P.2d 94 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
State v. Islas 647 P.2d 1188 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
State v. Islas 647 P.2d 1188 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
State v. SUPERIOR CT. OF STATE OF ARIZ., ETC. 629 P.2d 992 Ariz. 1981
State v. SUPERIOR CT. OF STATE OF ARIZ., ETC. 629 P.2d 992 Ariz. 1981
State v. Mulligan 613 P.2d 1266 Ariz. 1980
State v. Mulligan 613 P.2d 1266 Ariz. 1980
” State v. Smith, supra, 116 Ariz. at 390 , 569 P.2d at 820 .
State v. Gretzler 612 P.2d 1023 Ariz. 1980
State v. Gretzler 612 P.2d 1023 Ariz. 1980
2031 , 44 L.Ed.2d 589 (1975); , , (half of trial jury had knowledge of the case); , (all jurors had knowledge of the case).
State v. Sanchez 605 P.2d 907 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
State v. Sanchez 605 P.2d 907 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
State v. Smith 569 P.2d 817 Ariz. 1977
State v. Smith 569 P.2d 817 Ariz. 1977
State v. Moreno 547 P.2d 30 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
State v. Moreno 547 P.2d 30 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
State v. Rogers 545 P.2d 930 Ariz. 1976
State v. Rogers 545 P.2d 930 Ariz. 1976
State v. Smith 544 P.2d 213 Ariz. 1975
State v. Smith 544 P.2d 213 Ariz. 1975
(citations omitted) Moreover, there is a presumption in favor of the validity of a search warrant, (citation omitted).”
State v. Ferrari 541 P.2d 921 Ariz. 1975
State v. Ferrari 541 P.2d 921 Ariz. 1975
P.2d 81 (1965), cert, denied, 384 U.S. 1008 , 86 S. Ct. 1985 , 16 L.Ed.2d 1021 (1966)
State v. Pieck 529 P.2d 217 Ariz. 1974
State v. Pieck 529 P.2d 217 Ariz. 1974
State v. Peterson 512 P.2d 600 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
State v. Peterson 512 P.2d 600 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
State v. Adams, 18 Ariz.App.