Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Boyer, 470 P.2d 439.
- In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County, Juvenile Action No. JT30243 920 P.2d 779 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
- In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County, Juvenile Action No. JT30243 920 P.2d 779 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
- State v. Atwood 832 P.2d 593 Ariz. 1992
- State v. Atwood 832 P.2d 593 Ariz. 1992
- State v. Ferreira 627 P.2d 681 Ariz. 1981
- State v. Ferreira 627 P.2d 681 Ariz. 1981
- State v. Jarzab 599 P.2d 761 Ariz. 1979
- State v. Jarzab 599 P.2d 761 Ariz. 1979
- State v. Schutte 573 P.2d 882 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
- State v. Schutte 573 P.2d 882 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
- State v. Dupuy 568 P.2d 1049 Ariz. 1977
- State v. Dupuy 568 P.2d 1049 Ariz. 1977
- State v. Million 556 P.2d 338 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
- State v. Winters 556 P.2d 809 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
-
State v. Winters
556 P.2d 809
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
State v. Vandeveer, 23 Ariz.App.
- State v. Million 556 P.2d 338 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
- State v. Dugan 555 P.2d 108 Ariz. 1976
-
State v. Dugan
555 P.2d 108
Ariz. 1976
State v. Vandeveer, 23 Ariz.App.
- State v. Fortier 553 P.2d 1206 Ariz. 1976
-
State v. Fortier
553 P.2d 1206
Ariz. 1976
State v. Vandeveer, 23 Ariz.App.
- State v. Taylor 537 P.2d 938 Ariz. 1975
- State v. Taylor 537 P.2d 938 Ariz. 1975
- State v. Vandeveer 533 P.2d 91 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
- State v. Vandeveer 533 P.2d 91 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
- State v. Endreson 506 P.2d 248 Ariz. 1973
- State v. Endreson 506 P.2d 248 Ariz. 1973
- State v. Adams 501 P.2d 561 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
- State v. Adams 501 P.2d 561 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
- State v. Byers 490 P.2d 580 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
-
State v. Byers
490 P.2d 580
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1971
ibed the accused’s criminal activity in sufficient detail that the magistrate may know that he is relying on something more substantial than a casual rumor circulating in the underworld or an accusation based merely on an individual’s general reputation.” The State argues that the detail of the affidavit, together with Sergeant Harris’ testimony