Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Mahoney, 475 P.2d 479.

41 citing documents.

State of Arizona v. Ronald James Sisco II 373 P.3d 549 Ariz. 2016
State of Arizona v. Ronald James Sisco II 373 P.3d 549 Ariz. 2016
(holding that odor of burning marijuana emanating from hotel room afforded probable cause to believe crime had been or was being committed); (holding that odor of marijuana afforded probable cause to believe automobile contained contraband); –02, –84 (1970) (holding that probable cause was established by odor of marijuana emanating from suitcase).
State of Arizona v. Ronald James Sisco II 359 P.3d 1 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
State of Arizona v. Ronald James Sisco II 359 P.3d 1 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
-02 , -84 (1970); State v. Raymond, 21 Ariz.App.
State v. Murray 906 P.2d 542 Ariz. 1995
State v. Murray 906 P.2d 542 Ariz. 1995
State v. Rowan 848 P.2d 864 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1992
State v. Rowan 848 P.2d 864 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1992
The ordinary meaning of the word “transport” is “to transfer or convey from one place to another.” , , cert.
State v. McInelly 704 P.2d 291 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
State v. McInelly 704 P.2d 291 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
State v. Miller 658 P.2d 808 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
State v. Miller 658 P.2d 808 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
State v. Decker 580 P.2d 333 Ariz. 1978
State v. Decker 580 P.2d 333 Ariz. 1978
State v. Decker 580 P.2d 351 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
State v. Noles 546 P.2d 814 Ariz. 1976
State v. Noles 546 P.2d 814 Ariz. 1976
State v. Goldberg 540 P.2d 674 Ariz. 1975
State v. Goldberg 540 P.2d 674 Ariz. 1975
However, , we held that a warrantless search of a suitcase obtained from an automobile was justified since the police officer had detected the odor of marijuana coming from the suit *205 case.
State v. Taylor 537 P.2d 938 Ariz. 1975
State v. Taylor 537 P.2d 938 Ariz. 1975
cert, denied, 401 U.S. 917 , 91 S.Ct.
State v. Babineaux 526 P.2d 1277 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
State v. Babineaux 526 P.2d 1277 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
545 , , , ” 20 Ariz.App.
State v. Salcido 525 P.2d 298 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
State v. Salcido 525 P.2d 298 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
State v. Raymond, 21 Ariz.App.
State v. Benge 520 P.2d 843 Ariz. 1974
State v. Benge 520 P.2d 843 Ariz. 1974
we held a gun was properly admitted into evidence in a prosecution for transportation of marijuana as showing the complete story of the transportation of the marijuana and arrest.
State v. Money 514 P.2d 1014 Ariz. 1973
State v. Money 514 P.2d 1014 Ariz. 1973
State v. Lockner 513 P.2d 374 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
State v. Lockner 513 P.2d 374 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
Penaskovic v. F. W. Woolworth Co. 513 P.2d 692 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
Penaskovic v. F. W. Woolworth Co. 513 P.2d 692 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
State v. Cordova 511 P.2d 621 Ariz. 1973
State v. Cordova 511 P.2d 621 Ariz. 1973
1985 , 16 L.Ed.2d 1021 (1966); , , , cert.
State v. Taylor 508 P.2d 731 Ariz. 1973
State v. Taylor 508 P.2d 731 Ariz. 1973
State v. Bertram 504 P.2d 520 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
State v. Bertram 504 P.2d 520 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
See also Chambers v. Maroney, supra; , , ; State v. Kelley, supra; , .
State v. Tacon 488 P.2d 973 Ariz. 1971
State v. Tacon 488 P.2d 973 Ariz. 1971