DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Gause, 489 P.2d 830.

28 citing documents.

  • State v. Fulminante 975 P.2d 75 Ariz. 1999
  • State v. Fulminante 975 P.2d 75 Ariz. 1999
    -95 , -34 (1971), judgment vacated by Gause v. Ari zona, 409 U.S. 815 , 93 S.Ct.
  • State v. Charo 754 P.2d 288 Ariz. 1988
  • State v. Charo 754 P.2d 288 Ariz. 1988
    *563 The state argues that the testimony-concerning the sexual assault is admissible as evidence of the victim’s state of mind, relying on this court’s -95 , -34 (1971), vacated on other grounds, 409 U.S. 815 , 93 S.Ct.
  • State v. Martin 663 P.2d 236 Ariz. 1983
  • State v. Martin 663 P.2d 236 Ariz. 1983
    vacated on other grounds 409 U.S. 815 , 93 S.Ct.
  • State v. Jeffers 661 P.2d 1105 Ariz. 1983
  • State v. Jeffers 661 P.2d 1105 Ariz. 1983
    vacated on other grounds, 409 U.S. 815 , 93 S.Ct.
  • State v. Williams 650 P.2d 1202 Ariz. 1982
  • State v. Williams 650 P.2d 1202 Ariz. 1982
    The defendant argues that even if the evidence concerning the threats in general was properly excluded, the testimony of Paul Heatherly that Penny Williams told him that she was going to borrow a gun from the defendant was admissible under this court’s , vacated on other grounds, 409 U.S. 815 , 93 S.Ct.
  • State v. Lehman 616 P.2d 63 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
  • State v. Lehman 616 P.2d 63 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
    Unlike the situation in State v. Izzo, supra, where a defense of accident was interposed, , , vacated on other grounds, 409 U.S. 815 , 93 S.Ct.
  • State v. Ramirez 569 P.2d 201 Ariz. 1977
  • State v. Ramirez 569 P.2d 201 Ariz. 1977
    vacated on other grounds, 409 U.S. 815 , 93 S.Ct.
  • State v. MacUmber 544 P.2d 1084 Ariz. 1976
  • State v. MacUmber 544 P.2d 1084 Ariz. 1976
    vacated on other grounds, 409 U.S. 815 , 93 S.Ct.
  • State v. Gause 541 P.2d 396 Ariz. 1975
  • State v. Gause 541 P.2d 396 Ariz. 1975
    We affirmed the judgment and conviction
  • State v. Chavez 535 P.2d 26 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
  • State v. Chavez 535 P.2d 26 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
    vacated and remanded on other grounds, 409 U.S. 815 , 93 S.Ct.
  • State v. Richmond 533 P.2d 553 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1975
  • State v. Richmond 533 P.2d 553 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1975
  • State v. Ruffin 519 P.2d 63 Ariz. 1974
  • State v. Ruffin 519 P.2d 63 Ariz. 1974
  • State v. Duke 518 P.2d 570 Ariz. 1974
  • State v. Duke 518 P.2d 570 Ariz. 1974
    “Let us meet the problem head-on, brush aside the sophistry, and say that expressions of fear by a murder victim, though they may be hearsay, are relevant, have probative value on the issue of identity, and, when in human experience they have sufficient reliability, they should be *325 admitted in evidence.”
  • State v. Brierly 509 P.2d 203 Ariz. 1973
  • State v. Brierly 509 P.2d 203 Ariz. 1973
    After reviewing the record, , dispositive of the issue: Their testimony “was .