Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Hooper, 492 P.2d 1199.

6 citing documents.

State v. Olquin 165 P.3d 228 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
(citation omitted); , (holding two offenses of assault occurred where one gunshot struck two victims).
State v. Riley 992 P.2d 1135 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1999
(consecutive sentences for each offense upheld when single act caused separate criminal result to each of four victims); , (no error in imposing consecutive sentences for separate counts of aggravated assault committed upon each individual victim on same occasion); , (defendant could be separately punished for robbery of two victims even though the two offenses might have occurred at approximately same time and location).
State v. Stinson 539 P.2d 904 Ariz. 1975
The comparative severity of the punishment depends on the difference in terms of imprisonment, , not on the evidence introduced.
State v. Gantt 501 P.2d 12 Ariz. 1972
As to the two sentences in Cause No. 43666
State v. LaFleur 499 P.2d 756 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
State v. Belcher 496 P.2d 590 Ariz. 1972