Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Branch, 498 P.2d 218.

56 citing documents.

Moran v. Hon. miles/montgomery Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Moran v. Hon. miles/montgomery Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Chavez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Chavez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
(“An opportunity to prepare and present his defense without facing conviction of a crime of which he has no notice is an essential right for the criminal defendant.”); 1977) (“Due process requires that an accused be on notice
Roberto F. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 301 P.3d 211 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
Roberto F. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security 301 P.3d 211 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2013
State v. Amaya-Ruiz 800 P.2d 1260 Ariz. 1990
State v. Amaya-Ruiz 800 P.2d 1260 Ariz. 1990
State v. Whittle 752 P.2d 489 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
State v. Whittle 752 P.2d 489 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
State v. Grijalva 667 P.2d 1336 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
State v. Grijalva 667 P.2d 1336 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
The prosecutor’s remarks were supported by the evidence, , and were not error.
State v. Teran 635 P.2d 870 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
State v. Teran 635 P.2d 870 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
State v. Laffoon 610 P.2d 1045 Ariz. 1980
State v. Laffoon 610 P.2d 1045 Ariz. 1980
State v. Puryear 590 P.2d 475 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
State v. Puryear 590 P.2d 475 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
State v. Jackson 589 P.2d 1309 Ariz. 1979
State v. Jackson 589 P.2d 1309 Ariz. 1979
State v. Sustaita 583 P.2d 239 Ariz. 1978
State v. Sustaita 583 P.2d 239 Ariz. 1978
State v. Gutierrez 568 P.2d 1105 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
State v. Gutierrez 568 P.2d 1105 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
The test to determine whether one offense is included within the other is “whether the first offense cannot be committed without necessarily committing the second.”
State v. Sanders 564 P.2d 1256 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
State v. Sanders 564 P.2d 1256 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
State v. Henry 562 P.2d 374 Ariz. 1977
Distinguished State v. Henry 562 P.2d 374 Ariz. 1977
State v. Sims 560 P.2d 810 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
State v. Sims 560 P.2d 810 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
State v. Harrington 558 P.2d 28 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
State v. Harrington 558 P.2d 28 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Although wide latitude is afforded counsel in argument to the jury, it is qualified by a requirement that the remarks be supported by the evidence, , and are not prejudicial.
State v. Scott 537 P.2d 40 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1975
State v. Scott 537 P.2d 40 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1975
State v. Harris 533 P.2d 569 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1975
State v. Harris 533 P.2d 569 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1975
In Re the Appeal in Marcopa County, Juvenile Action No. J-75755 523 P.2d 1304 Ariz. 1974
In Re the Appeal in Marcopa County, Juvenile Action No. J-75755 523 P.2d 1304 Ariz. 1974
State v. Jaramillo 520 P.2d 1105 Ariz. 1974
State v. Jaramillo 520 P.2d 1105 Ariz. 1974
State v. Clark 517 P.2d 1238 Ariz. 1974
State v. Clark 517 P.2d 1238 Ariz. 1974
State v. Schmidgall 515 P.2d 609 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
State v. Schmidgall 515 P.2d 609 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
1877 , 32 L.Ed.2d 411 (1972)
State v. Trotter 514 P.2d 1249 Ariz. 1973
State v. Rodriquez 514 P.2d 1245 Ariz. 1973
State v. Trotter 514 P.2d 1249 Ariz. 1973
State v. Rodriquez 514 P.2d 1245 Ariz. 1973
September 26, 1973; , , September 20, 1973; , , , cert.
State v. Taylor 514 P.2d 439 Ariz. 1973
State v. Taylor 514 P.2d 439 Ariz. 1973

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by