Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Thomas, 515 P.2d 865.
- State v. Patterson 56 P.3d 1097 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
-
State v. Patterson
56 P.3d 1097
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
-31 , -76 (1973) (allowing the state to reopen after the defense had rested).
- State v. Spreitz 945 P.2d 1260 Ariz. 1997
-
State v. Spreitz
945 P.2d 1260
Ariz. 1997
State v. Chapple, 135 Ariz. at 288 , 660 P.2d at 1215 ( , ).
- State v. Doody 930 P.2d 440 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
- State v. Doody 930 P.2d 440 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
- State v. West 862 P.2d 192 Ariz. 1993
- State v. West 862 P.2d 192 Ariz. 1993
- State v. Walton 769 P.2d 1017 Ariz. 1989
- State v. Walton 769 P.2d 1017 Ariz. 1989
- State v. Staatz 768 P.2d 143 Ariz. 1988
- State v. Staatz 768 P.2d 143 Ariz. 1988
- State v. Littles 749 P.2d 914 Ariz. 1988
- State v. Littles 749 P.2d 914 Ariz. 1988
- State v. Castaneda 724 P.2d 1 Ariz. 1986
- State v. Castaneda 724 P.2d 1 Ariz. 1986
- State v. Correll 715 P.2d 721 Ariz. 1986
- State v. Correll 715 P.2d 721 Ariz. 1986
- State v. Bracy 703 P.2d 464 Ariz. 1985
- State v. Bracy 703 P.2d 464 Ariz. 1985
- State v. Summerlin 675 P.2d 686 Ariz. 1983
-
State v. Summerlin
675 P.2d 686
Ariz. 1983
We have stated that: , we identified the following uses for which photographs of a corpse may be admitted in a homicide prosecution: to prove the corpus delicti, to identify the victim, to show the nature and location of the fatal injury, to help determine the degree or atrociousness of the crime, to corroborate state
- State v. Maldonado 675 P.2d 735 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
- State v. Maldonado 675 P.2d 735 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
- State v. Grilz 666 P.2d 1059 Ariz. 1983
- State v. Grilz 666 P.2d 1059 Ariz. 1983
- State v. Chapple 660 P.2d 1208 Ariz. 1983
-
State v. Chapple
660 P.2d 1208
Ariz. 1983
we identified the following uses for which photographs of a corpse may be admitted in a homicide prosecution: to prove the corpus delicti, to identify the victim, to show the nature and location of the fatal injury, to help determine the degree or atrociousness of the crime, to corroborate state
- State v. Gerlaugh 654 P.2d 800 Ariz. 1982
- State v. Gerlaugh 654 P.2d 800 Ariz. 1982
- State Ex Rel. Collins v. SUPERIOR COURT, ETC. 644 P.2d 1266 Ariz. 1982
-
State Ex Rel. Collins v. SUPERIOR COURT, ETC.
644 P.2d 1266
Ariz. 1982
“The right to confrontation granted to defendants by the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution is also a valuable right for the trier of fact, allowing the witness’s demeanor to be observed and his credibility weighed.”
- State v. Gretzler 612 P.2d 1023 Ariz. 1980
- State v. Gretzler 612 P.2d 1023 Ariz. 1980
- State v. Smith 599 P.2d 199 Ariz. 1979
- State v. Smith 599 P.2d 199 Ariz. 1979
- State v. Steele 586 P.2d 1274 Ariz. 1978
- State v. Steele 586 P.2d 1274 Ariz. 1978
- State v. Caldwell 573 P.2d 864 Ariz. 1977
- State v. Caldwell 573 P.2d 864 Ariz. 1977
- State v. Powers 571 P.2d 1016 Ariz. 1977
-
State v. Powers
571 P.2d 1016
Ariz. 1977
This was not a case where malice aforethought was in issue, P.2d 921 (1975)
- State v. Ferrari 541 P.2d 921 Ariz. 1975
- State v. Ferrari 541 P.2d 921 Ariz. 1975
- State v. Riggins 528 P.2d 625 Ariz. 1974
- State v. Riggins 528 P.2d 625 Ariz. 1974
- State v. Skinner 515 P.2d 880 Ariz. 1973
-
State v. Skinner
515 P.2d 880
Ariz. 1973
On appeal we affirmed the conviction, , , No. 2199, filed this day.