DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Bainch, 505 P.2d 248.

38 citing documents.

  • State v. MacIel 358 P.3d 621 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • State v. MacIel 358 P.3d 621 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • State v. Riffle 638 P.2d 732 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
  • State v. Riffle 638 P.2d 732 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
    A No.” , our supreme court stated: “The vital point is whether, examining all the circumstances, the defendant was deprived of his freedom of action in any significant manner, and the defendant *68 was aware of such restraint.
  • State v. Dickey 608 P.2d 302 Ariz. 1980
  • State v. Dickey 608 P.2d 302 Ariz. 1980
  • State v. Holley 599 P.2d 835 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
  • State v. Holley 599 P.2d 835 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
    Annot., 31 A.L.R.3d 565 , Sec.
  • State v. Garrison 585 P.2d 563 Ariz. 1978
  • State v. Garrison 585 P.2d 563 Ariz. 1978
  • State v. Sustaita 583 P.2d 239 Ariz. 1978
  • State v. Sustaita 583 P.2d 239 Ariz. 1978
  • State v. Sustaita 583 P.2d 256 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
  • State v. Sustaita 583 P.2d 256 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
  • State v. Hatton 568 P.2d 1040 Ariz. 1977
  • State v. Hatton 568 P.2d 1040 Ariz. 1977
    1612 , 48 L.Ed.2d 1 (1976)
  • State v. Kennedy 570 P.2d 508 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
  • State v. Kennedy 570 P.2d 508 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
    1602 , 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966)
  • State v. Wynn 562 P.2d 734 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
  • State v. Wynn 562 P.2d 734 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
  • State v. Moreno 556 P.2d 14 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
  • State v. Moreno 556 P.2d 14 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
    “The fact that an officer may be suspicious of an individual is not the test as *463 to whether Miranda warnings must be given prior to questioning, nor is the mere presence of a police officer to be considered a restraint on the suspect’s liberty.
  • State v. Brewer 549 P.2d 188 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
  • State v. Brewer 549 P.2d 188 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
  • State v. Wilson 548 P.2d 23 Ariz. 1976
  • State v. Wilson 548 P.2d 23 Ariz. 1976
    “Custody is now the crucial issue in determining whether Miranda warnings are necessary before a statement by defendant may be received in evidence against him.”
  • State v. Hill 545 P.2d 999 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
  • State v. Hill 545 P.2d 999 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
    our Supreme Court set out the following test for determining when' Miranda warnings were required : The fact that an officer may be suspicious of an individual is not the test as to whether Miranda warnings must be given prior to ' questioning, nor is the mere presence of a police officer, to be
  • State v. Landrum 544 P.2d 664 Ariz. 1976
  • State v. Landrum 544 P.2d 664 Ariz. 1976
    Though it appears that the appellant was “deprived of his freedom of action * * * and * * * was aware of such restraint”, at 79 , at 250 (1973), we do not agree that the confrontation between the officer and the appellant had reached the interrogation stage.
  • State v. Wilson 542 P.2d 1162 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1975
  • State v. Wilson 542 P.2d 1162 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1975
    *284 , the Court stated: “The fact that an officer may be suspicious of an individual is not the test as to whether Miranda warnings must be given prior to questioning, nor is the mere presence of a police officer to be considered a restraint on the suspect’s liberty.
  • State v. Hocker 541 P.2d 419 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
  • State v. Hocker 541 P.2d 419 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
    See, e. g., , ; , ; State v. Tellez, 6 Ariz.App.
  • State v. Taylor 537 P.2d 938 Ariz. 1975
  • State v. Taylor 537 P.2d 938 Ariz. 1975
  • State v. Mayes 518 P.2d 568 Ariz. 1974
  • State v. Mayes 518 P.2d 568 Ariz. 1974
    we stated: “The fact that an officer may be suspicious of an individual is not the test as to whether Miranda warnings must be given prior to questioning, nor is the mere presence of a police officer to be considered a restraint on the suspect’s liberty.