Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Miller, 501 P.2d 383.

31 citing documents.

State v. Reilly Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Reilly Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
Appellant has not shown that the evidence he seeks would have been helpful to his defense, and we find no error, much less fundamental error.
State of Arizona v. Tynerial Ray Kindred 307 P.3d 1038 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
State of Arizona v. Tynerial Ray Kindred 307 P.3d 1038 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2013
Action No. J-75755, -06, -07 (1974)
State v. Lara 880 P.2d 1124 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1994
State v. Lara 880 P.2d 1124 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1994
State v. West 862 P.2d 192 Ariz. 1993
State v. West 862 P.2d 192 Ariz. 1993
State v. Shumway 672 P.2d 929 Ariz. 1983
State v. Shumway 672 P.2d 929 Ariz. 1983
State v. Lujan 664 P.2d 646 Ariz. 1983
State v. Lujan 664 P.2d 646 Ariz. 1983
State v. Axley 646 P.2d 268 Ariz. 1982
State v. Axley 646 P.2d 268 Ariz. 1982
State v. Mincey 636 P.2d 637 Ariz. 1981
State v. Mincey 636 P.2d 637 Ariz. 1981
We have previously held that “[a] defendant is entitled to have the jury instructed on any theory of his case reasonably supported by the evidence.”
State v. Melendez 588 P.2d 294 Ariz. 1978
State v. Melendez 588 P.2d 294 Ariz. 1978
A defendant is entitled to have the jury instructed on any theory of his case reasonably supported by the evidence, , but instructions need not be given if their substance is covered by other instructions given by the trial court.
State v. Starr 581 P.2d 706 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
State v. Starr 581 P.2d 706 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
In Matter of Appeal in Maricopa County, Juvenile Action No. J—75755, , see also
State v. Duran 575 P.2d 1265 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
State v. Duran 575 P.2d 1265 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
State v. Ulin 548 P.2d 19 Ariz. 1976
State v. Ulin 548 P.2d 19 Ariz. 1976
“A defendant is entitled to an instruction on his theory of the case if reasonably supported by the evidence.”
State v. Govorko 533 P.2d 688 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1975
State v. Govorko 533 P.2d 688 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1975
In Re the Appeal in Marcopa County, Juvenile Action No. J-75755 523 P.2d 1304 Ariz. 1974
In Re the Appeal in Marcopa County, Juvenile Action No. J-75755 523 P.2d 1304 Ariz. 1974
this court held that because the burglary statute does not contain the common law requirement of breaking and entering and only requires a showing that the person entering the building with intent to commit theft or any felony, forcible trespass, A.R.S.
In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County, Juvenile Action No. J-75755 521 P.2d 641 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
State v. Evans 519 P.2d 1148 Ariz. 1974
State v. Evans 519 P.2d 1148 Ariz. 1974