Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Clayton, 514 P.2d 720.

70 citing documents.

State v. Ceja 546 P.2d 6 Ariz. 1976
State v. Ceja 546 P.2d 6 Ariz. 1976
(c) provides that: “ * * * , that the court is duty bound in all homicide cases to instruct the jury on all necessarily-included offenses that the evidence will support, regardless of whether or not such instruction is requested.” , , are cases governed by the former criminal rules and are not contrary to the comment.
State v. Thomas 540 P.2d 1242 Ariz. 1975
State v. Thomas 540 P.2d 1242 Ariz. 1975
State v. Moore 540 P.2d 1252 Ariz. 1975
State v. Moore 540 P.2d 1252 Ariz. 1975
State v. Richmond 540 P.2d 700 Ariz. 1975
State v. Richmond 540 P.2d 700 Ariz. 1975
“We the jury * * * do find the defendant -of the crime of murder, second degree.” While we have said: “The trial court should instruct the jury on every degree or grade of the offense which is supported by the evidence, * * , ( , 522P.2d 25 (1974).
State v. Helmick 540 P.2d 638 Ariz. 1975
State v. Helmick 540 P.2d 638 Ariz. 1975
State v. Taylor 537 P.2d 938 Ariz. 1975
State v. Taylor 537 P.2d 938 Ariz. 1975
State v. Bojorquez 535 P.2d 6 Ariz. 1975
State v. Bojorquez 535 P.2d 6 Ariz. 1975
State v. Vanderlinden 530 P.2d 1107 Ariz. 1975
State v. Vanderlinden 530 P.2d 1107 Ariz. 1975
State v. Miniefield 522 P.2d 25 Ariz. 1974
State v. Miniefield 522 P.2d 25 Ariz. 1974
State v. Skinner 515 P.2d 880 Ariz. 1973
State v. Skinner 515 P.2d 880 Ariz. 1973
See also State v. Clayton & Penrod, , , filed September 27, 1973.