Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Shing, 509 P.2d 698.

56 citing documents.

State of Arizona v. Giovani Fuster Melendez 565 P.3d 1034 Ariz. 2025
State of Arizona v. Giovani Fuster Melendez 565 P.3d 1034 Ariz. 2025
¶38 The court of appeals also relied on three pre-Doyle and pre-Anderson cases—
State v. Melendez 535 P.3d 16 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Melendez 535 P.3d 16 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
For example, the defendant was apprehended by police at the scene of a crime, informed of his Miranda rights, and asked if he wanted to speak with the authorities, to which he responded “Yea.” Id.
State v. Hollingsworth Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Hollingsworth Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Henderson 100 P.3d 911 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
State v. Henderson 100 P.3d 911 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
See, -69 , -24 (1984); , , , ” 158 Ariz. at 424 n. 4, 763 P.2d at 244 n. 4 (1988).
State v. Scott 924 P.2d 507 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
State v. Scott 924 P.2d 507 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
564, 570 , (large quantity of heroin involved supported severe sentence); , (lengthy prison sentence appropriate where 2600 pounds of marijuana transported).
State v. Guerra 778 P.2d 1185 Ariz. 1989
State v. Guerra 778 P.2d 1185 Ariz. 1989
United States v. Schmitt, 794 F.2d 555, 559 (10th Cir.1986); Phelps v. Duckworth, 772 F.2d 1410, 1413 (7th Cir.1985); United States v. Cummiskey, 728 F.2d 200, 204 (3d Cir.1984); Meeks v. Havener, 545 F.2d 9, 10 (6th Cir.1976); United States v. Wycoff, 545 F.2d 679 (9th Cir.1976); , , -18 , -17 (App.1977).
State v. King 763 P.2d 239 Ariz. 1988
State v. King 763 P.2d 239 Ariz. 1988
State v. Vild 746 P.2d 1304 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
State v. Vild 746 P.2d 1304 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
at 2245 , 49 L.Ed.2d at 422
State v. Routhier 669 P.2d 68 Ariz. 1983
State v. Routhier 669 P.2d 68 Ariz. 1983
State v. Robinson 620 P.2d 703 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
State v. Robinson 620 P.2d 703 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
2240 , 49 L.Ed.2d 91 (1976)
State v. Newman 595 P.2d 665 Ariz. 1979
State v. Newman 595 P.2d 665 Ariz. 1979
for support of his position regarding fundamental error.
State v. Davis 582 P.2d 175 Ariz. 1978
State v. Davis 582 P.2d 175 Ariz. 1978
see also Doyle v. Ohio, 426 U.S. 610 , 96 S.Ct.
State v. Bowie 580 P.2d 1190 Ariz. 1978
State v. Bowie 580 P.2d 1190 Ariz. 1978
see also Doyle v. Ohio, 426 U.S. 610 , 96 S.Ct.
State v. Tuzon 575 P.2d 1231 Ariz. 1978
State v. Tuzon 575 P.2d 1231 Ariz. 1978
2240 , 49 L.Ed.2d 91 (1976)
State v. Fleming 571 P.2d 268 Ariz. 1977
State v. Fleming 571 P.2d 268 Ariz. 1977
State v. Calhoun 563 P.2d 914 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
State v. Calhoun 563 P.2d 914 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
State v. Greer, 17 Ariz.App.
State v. Lee 559 P.2d 657 Ariz. 1976
State v. Lee 559 P.2d 657 Ariz. 1976
2240 , 49 L.Ed.2d 91 (1976)
State v. Scott 555 P.2d 118 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
State v. Scott 555 P.2d 118 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
(Judge Jacobson specially concurring); State v. Greer, 17 Ariz.App.
State v. Raffaele 550 P.2d 1060 Ariz. 1976
State v. Raffaele 550 P.2d 1060 Ariz. 1976
State v. Moreno 547 P.2d 30 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
State v. Moreno 547 P.2d 30 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
Although it is improper to introduce evidence of an accused’s silence in reply to questions asked when he is in custody, , appellant here did not refuse to answer the questions nor did he specifically exercise his right to remain silent.
State v. Owens 540 P.2d 695 Ariz. 1975
State v. Owens 540 P.2d 695 Ariz. 1975
State v. Finn 528 P.2d 615 Ariz. 1974
State v. Finn 528 P.2d 615 Ariz. 1974
State v. Zaerr 521 P.2d 1131 Ariz. 1974
State v. Zaerr 521 P.2d 1131 Ariz. 1974
State v. Padilla 519 P.2d 857 Ariz. 1974
State v. Padilla 519 P.2d 857 Ariz. 1974
State Ex Rel. Berger v. Superior Court 519 P.2d 73 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
State Ex Rel. Berger v. Superior Court 519 P.2d 73 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
However, in Griffin and the cases following it, , it is the inference of guilt which may be painted by the prosecutor in commenting on the defendant’s silence which is prohibited.