Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Taylor, 508 P.2d 731.

48 citing documents.

State of Arizona v. Jose Alejandro Acuna Valenzuela 426 P.3d 1176 Ariz. 2018
State of Arizona v. Jose Alejandro Acuna Valenzuela 426 P.3d 1176 Ariz. 2018
22 STATE v. ACUNA VALENZUELA Opinion of the Court state follows up with an appropriate limiting comment, ¶ 113 (2013), or when the statements are solitary or isolated, –42 ¶¶ 53–54 (2003), supplemented
State v. Lámar 72 P.3d 831 Ariz. 2003
State v. Lámar 72 P.3d 831 Ariz. 2003
(holding prosecutor's expression of personal opinion as to defendant's guilt and at least two avowals as to a witness's credibility did not prejudice the defendant, in *842 part, because court instructed jury that closing argument was not evidence); , (holding instruction that counsel's argument was not evidence corrected any prejudice due to prosecutor's opinion as to credibility of a state witness and defendant's guilt); State v. Dillon, 26 Ariz.App.
State v. King 883 P.2d 1024 Ariz. 1994
State v. King 883 P.2d 1024 Ariz. 1994
(citation omitted); , (listing cases in which court refused to consider allegations of improper statements by prosecution when defendant failed to make timely objection).
State v. Navallez 639 P.2d 362 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
State v. Navallez 639 P.2d 362 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
State v. Morales 630 P.2d 1015 Ariz. 1981
State v. Morales 630 P.2d 1015 Ariz. 1981
1439 , 39 L.Ed.2d 487 (1974)
State v. Clark 616 P.2d 888 Ariz. 1980
State v. Clark 616 P.2d 888 Ariz. 1980
that if the issues are adequately covered by the instructions given, it is not error to refuse to single out a particular element for a special instruction.
State v. Gretzler 612 P.2d 1023 Ariz. 1980
State v. Gretzler 612 P.2d 1023 Ariz. 1980
All that is required is a jury selected by a process where the members of his race are not systematically excluded.”
State v. Bowie 580 P.2d 1190 Ariz. 1978
State v. Bowie 580 P.2d 1190 Ariz. 1978
State v. Ferguson 579 P.2d 559 Ariz. 1978
State v. Ferguson 579 P.2d 559 Ariz. 1978
State v. Valencia 575 P.2d 335 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
State v. Valencia 575 P.2d 335 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
State v. Powers 571 P.2d 1016 Ariz. 1977
State v. Powers 571 P.2d 1016 Ariz. 1977
f a lawful act by lawful means and where the person causing the death acted with that care and caution which would be exercised by an ordinarily careful and prudent individual under like circumstances.” “Where matters are adequately covered by other instructions, it is not error for the trial court to refuse to single out a particular element of the case for special instruction.”
State v. Barr 565 P.2d 526 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
State v. Barr 565 P.2d 526 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
State v. Lee 559 P.2d 657 Ariz. 1976
State v. Lee 559 P.2d 657 Ariz. 1976
State v. Williams 556 P.2d 317 Ariz. 1976
State v. Williams 556 P.2d 317 Ariz. 1976
State v. Owens 540 P.2d 695 Ariz. 1975
State v. Owens 540 P.2d 695 Ariz. 1975
Any prejudice resulting from the prosecutor’s misstatement of the evidence in this case was diminished by the trial court’s cautionary instruction to the jury that counsel’s “arguments are not evidence” and that “[i]f any comment of counsel has no basis in the evidence, you are to disregard that comment.”
State v. Mendiola 532 P.2d 193 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
State v. Mendiola 532 P.2d 193 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
State v. Williams 526 P.2d 714 Ariz. 1974
State v. Williams 526 P.2d 714 Ariz. 1974
State v. Arredondo 526 P.2d 163 Ariz. 1974
State v. Arredondo 526 P.2d 163 Ariz. 1974
State v. Juarez 524 P.2d 155 Ariz. 1974
State v. Juarez 524 P.2d 155 Ariz. 1974
State v. Thomas 515 P.2d 865 Ariz. 1973
State v. Thomas 515 P.2d 865 Ariz. 1973
State v. Scarborough 514 P.2d 997 Ariz. 1973
State v. Scarborough 514 P.2d 997 Ariz. 1973
ional, arbitrary or systematic discrimination against 18 to 21 year olds from serving on the jury at this time and the fact that there was an understandable delay, in implementing the requirement that 18 year olds and over be placed on the voter registration list did not invalidate a jury list taken from the voter roles prior to the time voters 18 to 21 were allowed to register.”
State v. Money 514 P.2d 1014 Ariz. 1973
State v. Money 514 P.2d 1014 Ariz. 1973
State v. Clayton 514 P.2d 720 Ariz. 1973
State v. Clayton 514 P.2d 720 Ariz. 1973
State v. Schmid 509 P.2d 619 Ariz. 1973
State v. Schmid 509 P.2d 619 Ariz. 1973
2845 , 33 L.Ed.2d 744 (1972)