Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Evans, 512 P.2d 1225.
- State v. Brown 556 P.3d 776 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
-
State v. Brown
556 P.3d 776
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
at 337 ( aff’d in part, rev’d and remanded in part, and United States v. Bryant, 461 F.2d 912 (6th Cir. 1972)).
- State v. Cheramie 171 P.3d 1253 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
-
State v. Cheramie
171 P.3d 1253
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
upon matters vital to a proper consideration of evidence.”
- State v. Canion 16 P.3d 788 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
- State v. Valenzuela 984 P.2d 12 Ariz. 1999
- State v. Valenzuela 984 P.2d 12 Ariz. 1999
- State v. Sanchez 956 P.2d 1240 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1997
-
State v. Sanchez
956 P.2d 1240
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1997
422, 428 , because we could “find no authority for giving both probation and a jail sentence for the crime [of illegal possession of marijuana].” , (no statutory authority to impose eight- to ten-year prison sentence as condition of probation).
- State v. Fullem 912 P.2d 1363 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
- State v. Fullem 912 P.2d 1363 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
- State v. Morrison 889 P.2d 637 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
- State v. Morrison 889 P.2d 637 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
- State v. Lara 880 P.2d 1124 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1994
- State v. Lara 880 P.2d 1124 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1994
- State v. Smith 774 P.2d 811 Ariz. 1989
-
State v. Smith
774 P.2d 811
Ariz. 1989
We have defined fundamental error in the context of jury instructions as “such error as goes to the foundation of the case, or which takes from the defendant a right essential to his defense.” , ( , ).
- State v. Leonardo 751 P.2d 598 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
- State v. Leonardo 751 P.2d 598 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
- State v. Benally 669 P.2d 1030 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
-
State v. Benally
669 P.2d 1030
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
As authority for his position, appellant cites, inter alia, , and State v. Van Meter, 7 Ariz.App.
- State v. Thomas 652 P.2d 1380 Ariz. 1982
-
State v. Thomas
652 P.2d 1380
Ariz. 1982
In the context of jury instructions, this court has defined fundamental error as “such error as goes to the foundation of the case, or which takes from the defendant a right essential to his defense.”
- State v. Islas 647 P.2d 1188 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
- State v. Islas 647 P.2d 1188 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
- State v. Agnew 647 P.2d 1165 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
-
State v. Agnew
647 P.2d 1165
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
(failure to sua sponte give instruction on specific intent, intent not an issue); , *576 State v. Reim, 26 Ariz.App.
- State v. Tison 633 P.2d 335 Ariz. 1981
- State v. Tison 633 P.2d 335 Ariz. 1981
- State v. Blevins 623 P.2d 853 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
- State v. Blevins 623 P.2d 853 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
- State v. Price 598 P.2d 1016 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
- State v. Price 598 P.2d 1016 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
- State v. Reinhold 597 P.2d 532 Ariz. 1979
-
State v. Reinhold
597 P.2d 532
Ariz. 1979
It is the judge’s duty to instruct the jury upon the law concerning the facts of the case and upon ‘matters vital to a proper consideration of the evidence.’
- State v. Stanley 597 P.2d 998 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
- State v. Stanley 597 P.2d 998 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
- State v. Miller 585 P.2d 244 Ariz. 1978
- State v. Miller 585 P.2d 244 Ariz. 1978
- State v. Long 580 P.2d 1181 Ariz. 1978
- State v. Long 580 P.2d 1181 Ariz. 1978
- State v. Arnett 579 P.2d 542 Ariz. 1978
- State v. Arnett 579 P.2d 542 Ariz. 1978
- State v. Carter 570 P.2d 763 Ariz. 1977
- State v. Carter 570 P.2d 763 Ariz. 1977
- State v. Barr 565 P.2d 526 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
- State v. Barr 565 P.2d 526 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
- State v. Corrao 563 P.2d 310 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
- State v. Corrao 563 P.2d 310 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
- State v. Weigel 554 P.2d 1286 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1976