Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Coward, 496 P.2d 131.

49 citing documents.

State v. Smith 762 P.2d 509 Ariz. 1988
State v. Smith 762 P.2d 509 Ariz. 1988
State v. Jobe 757 P.2d 604 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
State v. Jobe 757 P.2d 604 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
State v. Garland 756 P.2d 343 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
State v. Garland 756 P.2d 343 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
State v. Leonardo 751 P.2d 598 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
State v. Leonardo 751 P.2d 598 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
State v. Avila 686 P.2d 1295 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
State v. Avila 686 P.2d 1295 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
State v. Tison 633 P.2d 335 Ariz. 1981
State v. Tison 633 P.2d 335 Ariz. 1981
State v. Smith 599 P.2d 199 Ariz. 1979
State v. Smith 599 P.2d 199 Ariz. 1979
we found similar photographs of blood spots to be in no way gruesome or inflammatory.
State v. Jackson 603 P.2d 98 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
State v. Jackson 603 P.2d 98 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
State v. Hunt 577 P.2d 717 Ariz. 1978
State v. Hunt 577 P.2d 717 Ariz. 1978
State v. Lacquey 571 P.2d 1027 Ariz. 1977
State v. Lacquey 571 P.2d 1027 Ariz. 1977
§ 13—451(B); , , , cert.
State v. Young 569 P.2d 815 Ariz. 1977
State v. Young 569 P.2d 815 Ariz. 1977
We have said: “Errors or omissions in the giving of instructions which were not raised at trial will not be considered unless the error is so fundamental that it is manifest the defendant did not receive a fair trial.”
State v. Adams 555 P.2d 358 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
State v. Adams 555 P.2d 358 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
State v. Magby 554 P.2d 1272 Ariz. 1976
State v. Magby 554 P.2d 1272 Ariz. 1976
State v. Wilson 553 P.2d 235 Ariz. 1976
State v. Wilson 553 P.2d 235 Ariz. 1976
American Honda Motor Co., , , Rule 21.3(c), Arizona Rules of Criminal Procedure, 17 A.R.S.
State v. Dodds 537 P.2d 970 Ariz. 1975
State v. Dodds 537 P.2d 970 Ariz. 1975
State v. Parker 524 P.2d 506 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
State v. Parker 524 P.2d 506 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1974
State v. Tostado 523 P.2d 795 Ariz. 1974
State v. Tostado 523 P.2d 795 Ariz. 1974
State v. Mendell 523 P.2d 79 Ariz. 1974
State v. Mendell 523 P.2d 79 Ariz. 1974
See also, , in which murder in the second degree was affirmed in the case of an assault by a man on a woman.
State v. Duke 518 P.2d 570 Ariz. 1974
State v. Duke 518 P.2d 570 Ariz. 1974
rt, , , , have indicated that voluntary intoxication may produce a state of mind which incapacitates an accused from forming or entering the malicious intent or malice aforethought which is essential as an element of murder, , that is a question for the jury.
State v. King 514 P.2d 1032 Ariz. 1973
State v. King 514 P.2d 1032 Ariz. 1973
State v. Winter 513 P.2d 934 Ariz. 1973
State v. Winter 513 P.2d 934 Ariz. 1973
Tryon v. Naegle 510 P.2d 768 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
Tryon v. Naegle 510 P.2d 768 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
“Claims of error will not be considered on appeal where the trial court has not been given the opportunity to rule on an issue so as to correct the possible errors.”
State v. Shing 509 P.2d 698 Ariz. 1973
State v. Mathewson 498 P.2d 575 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
State v. Mathewson 498 P.2d 575 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1972
At the time of settling instructions, counsel requested an instruction on Aggravated Assault.” We hold that the record not only fails to reflect appropriate objections to the instructions as to the offense of aggravated assault, an essential prerequisite to raising the issue on appeal ( , decided 15 June 1972, , ) but that there was an affirmative acquiescence in the giving of the instruction and submitting the issue.
State v. Wheeler 498 P.2d 205 Ariz. 1972
State v. Wheeler 498 P.2d 205 Ariz. 1972