Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Fischer, 498 P.2d 147.
- State v. Harm 340 P.3d 1110 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
-
State v. Harm
340 P.3d 1110
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
a sentence is clearly within the statutory limits provided for the offense, a reviewing court will not disturb the sentence unless there is a clear abuse of discretion.”) ( ).
- State v. Kovacevich 547 P.2d 487 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
- State v. Bojorquez 535 P.2d 6 Ariz. 1975
-
State v. Bojorquez
535 P.2d 6
Ariz. 1975
State v. Fischer, 108, Ariz. 325
- State v. Villa 530 P.2d 363 Ariz. 1975
- State v. Villa 530 P.2d 363 Ariz. 1975
- State v. Snyder 529 P.2d 1183 Ariz. 1975
- State v. Snyder 529 P.2d 1183 Ariz. 1975
- State v. Smith 526 P.2d 392 Ariz. 1974
- State v. Smith 526 P.2d 392 Ariz. 1974
- State v. McDonald 526 P.2d 698 Ariz. 1974
- State v. McDonald 526 P.2d 698 Ariz. 1974
- State v. Cooper 523 P.2d 60 Ariz. 1974
- State v. Cooper 523 P.2d 60 Ariz. 1974
- State v. Drury 520 P.2d 495 Ariz. 1974
- State v. Drury 520 P.2d 495 Ariz. 1974
- State v. Battelle 520 P.2d 308 Ariz. 1974
- State v. Battelle 520 P.2d 308 Ariz. 1974
- State v. Mathis 517 P.2d 1250 Ariz. 1974
-
State v. Mathis
517 P.2d 1250
Ariz. 1974
State v. Thompson, Ariz.
- State v. Wasserott 516 P.2d 318 Ariz. 1973
- State v. Wasserott 516 P.2d 318 Ariz. 1973
- State v. Thompson 516 P.2d 42 Ariz. 1973
- State v. Thompson 516 P.2d 42 Ariz. 1973
- State v. Scarborough 514 P.2d 997 Ariz. 1973
- State v. Scarborough 514 P.2d 997 Ariz. 1973
- State v. Koker 513 P.2d 674 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
- State v. Koker 513 P.2d 674 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
- State v. Davis 511 P.2d 193 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
- State v. Davis 511 P.2d 193 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1973
- State v. Tyree 508 P.2d 335 Ariz. 1973
-
State v. Tyree
508 P.2d 335
Ariz. 1973
we had occasion to review the cases on the subject and to again hold that the matter of sentencing is within the discretion of the trial court and will not be disturbed unless there is a clear abuse of discretion.