Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Valenzuela, 506 P.2d 240.

32 citing documents.

State v. Felmate Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Felmate Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
(We may take judicial notice of records from the superior court.).
Simmons v. Temple Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
Simmons v. Temple Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Boyd Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
State v. Boyd Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2023
See State v. Boyd, Maricopa County Superior Court No. CR2000– 003971; (taking judicial notice of superior court records).
State v. Holt Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Holt Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Lozano v. Pacco Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Lozano v. Pacco Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
¶ 6, n.1 (App. 2018) (court may take judicial notice of related superior court records)
Vera v. Hon rogers/chaidez 433 P.3d 1190 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Vera v. Hon rogers/chaidez 433 P.3d 1190 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
(court may take judicial notice of related superior court records).
Bank of Ny v. Dodev 433 P.3d 549 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
Bank of Ny v. Dodev 433 P.3d 549 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2018
(appellate court reviewed superior court records from other cases relating to the defendant); (holding that “[i]t is proper for a court to take judicial notice of its own records or those of another action .
State v. Leary Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Leary Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Esposito Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Esposito Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Hillegass v. Garmon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
Hillegass v. Garmon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
(recognizing that the reviewing court may take judicial notice of the records of the superior court).
Duncan v. Progressive Preferred Ins. Co. 258 P.3d 216 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
Explained Duncan v. Progressive Preferred Ins. Co. 258 P.3d 216 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
(appellate court may take judicial notice of records of superior court).
State v. Bearup 211 P.3d 684 Ariz. 2009
State v. Bearup 211 P.3d 684 Ariz. 2009
(allowing judicial notice of the superior court records).
State v. Thomas 175 P.3d 71 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
Martin v. Reinstein 987 P.2d 779 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1999
State v. Schackart 947 P.2d 315 Ariz. 1997
State v. Schackart 947 P.2d 315 Ariz. 1997
Morris K. Udall et al., Arizona Practice, Law of Evidence § 152, at 331 (3d ed. 1991) (“Supreme Court will take judicial notice of its own records and decisions and those of superior courts.”).
State v. Lynch 562 P.2d 1386 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
State v. Lynch 562 P.2d 1386 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
Although it has been held that it is proper for a court to take judicial notice of procedural facts reflected in the record of another superior court action, such as the presence of counsel, , no authority has been cited which would extend this reasoning so as to permit the taking of judicial notice of the truth of testimony received in that other action.
City of Phoenix v. SUPERIOR COURT, CTY. OF MARICOPA 515 P.2d 1175 Ariz. 1973
City of Phoenix v. SUPERIOR COURT, CTY. OF MARICOPA 515 P.2d 1175 Ariz. 1973