Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Thomas, 515 P.2d 851.
- State v. Frank Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- State v. Frank Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
- State of Arizona v. James Darrell Johnson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
-
State of Arizona v. James Darrell Johnson
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2012
¶16 To the contrary, a defendant at an aggravation hearing is “free to dispute [the state’s evidence of aggravators] or produce any witness or other documentation to dispute the state’s evidence.” -10, -55 (1973).
- State v. McGill 140 P.3d 930 Ariz. 2006
- State v. Lamb 690 P.2d 764 Ariz. 1984
-
State v. Lamb
690 P.2d 764
Ariz. 1984
We have held, “[T]he trial judge is in the best position to study the defendant and his discretion in the matter of sentencing will not be disturbed except in the most unusual circumstances provided it is within the statutory limits.”
- State v. Smith 673 P.2d 17 Ariz. 1983
- State v. Smith 673 P.2d 17 Ariz. 1983
- State v. Conn 669 P.2d 581 Ariz. 1983
- State v. Conn 669 P.2d 581 Ariz. 1983
- State v. Fristoe 658 P.2d 825 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
- State v. Fristoe 658 P.2d 825 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
- State v. Johnson 640 P.2d 861 Ariz. 1982
- State v. Johnson 640 P.2d 861 Ariz. 1982
- State v. Phelps 608 P.2d 51 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
- State v. Phelps 608 P.2d 51 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
- State v. Newman 595 P.2d 665 Ariz. 1979
- State v. Newman 595 P.2d 665 Ariz. 1979
- State v. Myers 570 P.2d 1252 Ariz. 1977
-
State v. Myers
570 P.2d 1252
Ariz. 1977
See State v. Mitchell, supra
- State v. Donahoe 574 P.2d 830 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
-
State v. Donahoe
574 P.2d 830
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
*44 , involving a trial held prior to the promulgation of our present rules of criminal procedure, our Supreme Court held that the rules governing admissibility of evidence at trial including the right to confrontation and hearsay do not apply at a hearing in aggravation.
- State v. Perry 567 P.2d 786 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
- State v. Perry 567 P.2d 786 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
- State v. McGuire 555 P.2d 330 Ariz. 1976
- State v. McGuire 555 P.2d 330 Ariz. 1976
- State v. Williams 545 P.2d 938 Ariz. 1976
-
State v. Williams
545 P.2d 938
Ariz. 1976
“[T]here is broad leeway in cross-examination, [but] the control of cross-examination is left to the sound discretion of the trial judge and will not be disturbed on appeal in the absence of a showing from the record of an abuse of discretion.” at 109 , at 854 (1973).
- State v. Dale 544 P.2d 241 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1975
- State v. Dale 544 P.2d 241 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1975
- State v. Latino 540 P.2d 1285 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1975
- State v. Latino 540 P.2d 1285 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1975