Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Taylor, 537 P.2d 938.

49 citing documents.

State v. Alfartousi Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2026
Decision of the Court ¶28 “A defendant is not entitled to be tried by any particular jury but only by one which is fair and impartial.” see also Holland v. Illinois, 493 U.S. 474, 480 (1990) (stating the Sixth Amendment entitles a defendant to an impartial jury but not necessarily a representative one); (recognizing a perfect jury panel “is not possible”).
State v. Palmer 199 P.3d 706 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
State v. Palmer 199 P.3d 706 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2008
State v. Doody 930 P.2d 440 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
State v. Doody 930 P.2d 440 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
State v. Gertz 918 P.2d 1056 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
State v. Gertz 918 P.2d 1056 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
State v. Krum 903 P.2d 596 Ariz. 1995
State v. Krum 903 P.2d 596 Ariz. 1995
In re the Appeal in Cochise County Juvenile Delinquency Action No. DL88-00037 793 P.2d 570 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
In re the Appeal in Cochise County Juvenile Delinquency Action No. DL88-00037 793 P.2d 570 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
State v. Walton 769 P.2d 1017 Ariz. 1989
State v. Walton 769 P.2d 1017 Ariz. 1989
State v. Wagstaff 775 P.2d 1130 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
State v. Wagstaff 775 P.2d 1130 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1988
See United States v. Nace, 561 F.2d 763, 772 (9th Cir.1977)
State v. Littles 749 P.2d 914 Ariz. 1988
State v. Littles 749 P.2d 914 Ariz. 1988
State v. Eisenlord 670 P.2d 1209 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
State v. Eisenlord 670 P.2d 1209 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
State v. Sanchez 605 P.2d 907 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
State v. Sanchez 605 P.2d 907 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
State v. Archer 603 P.2d 918 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
State v. Archer 603 P.2d 918 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
State v. Valencia 589 P.2d 434 Ariz. 1979
State v. Valencia 589 P.2d 434 Ariz. 1979
State v. Jackson 576 P.2d 129 Ariz. 1978
State v. Jackson 576 P.2d 129 Ariz. 1978
See Gallegos v. Colo *273 rado, supra; , , State v. Hardy, supra.
In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. J-84357 576 P.2d 143 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. J-84357 576 P.2d 143 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
In Re the Appeal in Pima County Juvenile Action No. J-37390-1 570 P.2d 206 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
In Re the Appeal in Pima County Juvenile Action No. J-37390-1 570 P.2d 206 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
State v. Keller 562 P.2d 1070 Ariz. 1977
State v. Keller 562 P.2d 1070 Ariz. 1977
State v. Hagen 558 P.2d 750 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
State v. Hagen 558 P.2d 750 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
State v. Rodriquez 555 P.2d 655 Ariz. 1976
State v. Rodriquez 555 P.2d 655 Ariz. 1976
State v. Toney 555 P.2d 650 Ariz. 1976
State v. Toney 555 P.2d 650 Ariz. 1976
Arizona Rules of Procedure for Juvenile Court, Rule 18; , cert.
State v. Tacho 555 P.2d 338 Ariz. 1976
State v. Tacho 555 P.2d 338 Ariz. 1976
State v. Mattox 550 P.2d 630 Ariz. 1976
State v. Mattox 550 P.2d 630 Ariz. 1976
“Our examination of the record convinces us that Taylor’s statements were voluntarily made.” -82 , -52 (1975).
State v. Hinkle 550 P.2d 115 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1976
State v. Hinkle 550 P.2d 115 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1976
State v. Belkin 549 P.2d 608 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1976
State v. Belkin 549 P.2d 608 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1976
State v. Goldsmith 542 P.2d 1098 Ariz. 1975
State v. Goldsmith 542 P.2d 1098 Ariz. 1975