Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Mendoza, 511 P.2d 627.

29 citing documents.

State of Arizona v. Craig A. Williamson 343 P.3d 1 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
State of Arizona v. Craig A. Williamson 343 P.3d 1 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
Contrary to Williamson’s argument, the court stated that a defendant may “stipulate to the admission” or “have his admission 21 STATE v. WILLIAMSON Opinion of the Court of the elements read into evidence.” Id.
State v. Doody 930 P.2d 440 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
State v. Doody 930 P.2d 440 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
In deciding whether to reopen, the trial court should consider whether “all the evidence, offered in good faith and necessary to the ends of justice has been heard.” , ( , ).
State v. Soule 811 P.2d 1071 Ariz. 1991
State v. Abrams 791 P.2d 1068 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
State v. Abrams 791 P.2d 1068 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
State v. Walton 769 P.2d 1017 Ariz. 1989
State v. Walton 769 P.2d 1017 Ariz. 1989
State v. Johnson 693 P.2d 973 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
State v. Johnson 693 P.2d 973 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1984
State v. Nilsen 657 P.2d 419 Ariz. 1983
State v. Nilsen 657 P.2d 419 Ariz. 1983
If, as here, the state refuses the offered stipulation, at 447 , at 629 (1973).
State v. Rodgers 655 P.2d 1348 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
State v. Rodgers 655 P.2d 1348 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
State v. Crumley 625 P.2d 891 Ariz. 1981
State v. Crumley 625 P.2d 891 Ariz. 1981
State v. Archer 603 P.2d 918 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
State v. Archer 603 P.2d 918 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
The reception of evidence should not be foreclosed until “ ‘ “all the evidence, offered in good faith and necessary to the ends of justice has been heard.” ’ ”
State v. Bean 581 P.2d 257 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
State v. Bean 581 P.2d 257 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
State v. Owens 540 P.2d 695 Ariz. 1975
State v. Owens 540 P.2d 695 Ariz. 1975
State v. Keener 520 P.2d 510 Ariz. 1974
State v. Keener 520 P.2d 510 Ariz. 1974
State v. Mathis 517 P.2d 1250 Ariz. 1974
State v. Mathis 517 P.2d 1250 Ariz. 1974
State v. Brannin 514 P.2d 446 Ariz. 1973
State v. Brannin 514 P.2d 446 Ariz. 1973
It is apparent from a reading of the record that the delay may be responsible for the failure of some of the witnesses to testify as clearly and completely about the events prior to, during, and after the incident as would be desired.