Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Gonzales, 523 P.2d 66.

30 citing documents.

State v. Djerf 959 P.2d 1274 Ariz. 1998
State v. Djerf 959 P.2d 1274 Ariz. 1998
State v. Paxton 925 P.2d 721 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
State v. Paxton 925 P.2d 721 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
See Bible, 175 Ariz. at 599, 858 P.2d at 1202 (no violation of Fourth Amendment to test clothing seized without a warrant when police already had possession of it due to defendant’s incarceration)
State v. Bible 858 P.2d 1152 Ariz. 1993
State v. Bible 858 P.2d 1152 Ariz. 1993
denied, 444 U.S. 1049 , 100 S. Ct. 741 , 62 L.Ed.2d 736 (1980); , (clothing properly admitted in murder and rape case when defendant already in police custody on unrelated charge).
Bishop v. SUPERIOR COURT, IN & FOR PIMA CTY. 724 P.2d 23 Ariz. 1986
Bishop v. SUPERIOR COURT, IN & FOR PIMA CTY. 724 P.2d 23 Ariz. 1986
See Rule 11.4; , (error for physician to testify as to statements made by defendant during examination)
State v. Ortiz 698 P.2d 1301 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
State v. Ortiz 698 P.2d 1301 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
State v. Superior Court 672 P.2d 199 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
State v. Superior Court 672 P.2d 199 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
State v. Navarre 647 P.2d 178 Ariz. 1982
State v. Navarre 647 P.2d 178 Ariz. 1982
State v. Morales 587 P.2d 236 Ariz. 1978
State v. Morales 587 P.2d 236 Ariz. 1978
The State, however, , , and State v. Brock, supra, for the proposition that first degree murder by torture is a general intent crime.
In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. J-84357 576 P.2d 143 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
In Re the Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. J-84357 576 P.2d 143 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
State v. Goettel 572 P.2d 115 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
State v. Goettel 572 P.2d 115 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
in which clothing, taken from the defendant following his arrest for public drunkenness, was given by the Glendale Police Department to the Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office for use in a murder charge against him.
State v. Schutte 573 P.2d 882 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
State v. Schutte 573 P.2d 882 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
State v. Woods 561 P.2d 306 Ariz. 1977
State v. Woods 561 P.2d 306 Ariz. 1977
we held that an indictment properly supersedes a complaint, even when preliminary hearing has been set.
State v. Johnson 557 P.2d 1063 Ariz. 1976
State v. Johnson 557 P.2d 1063 Ariz. 1976
State v. Tacho 555 P.2d 338 Ariz. 1976
State v. Tacho 555 P.2d 338 Ariz. 1976
It is well-established law in Arizona that failure to object to an offer of evidence is a waiver of any ground of complaint against its admission, , and asserted error in the admission of evidence cannot be raised for the first time on appeal unless the error was fundamental.
State v. Decello 550 P.2d 633 Ariz. 1976
State v. Decello 550 P.2d 633 Ariz. 1976