Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Rice, 516 P.2d 1222.

81 citing documents.

State v. Harris Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
State v. Harris Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
¶9 Credits toward a sentence provided in statutes are matters of statutory right, and may only be forfeited following the provisions of the statutes
Planned Parenthood v. Kristin mayes/hazelrigg Ariz. 2024
Planned Parenthood v. Kristin mayes/hazelrigg Ariz. 2024
See, State Land Dep’t. v. Tucson Rock & Sand Co.
State of Arizona v. Daniel Louis Santillanes Ariz. 2024
State of Arizona v. Daniel Louis Santillanes Ariz. 2024
(); (“[O]ur duty is to harmonize statutes and we ‘will not construe a statute as repealed by implication’ if we can avoid it.” (quoting State ex rel.
Carter Oil v. Ador Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
Carter Oil v. Ador Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Brandeberry Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Brandeberry Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Stewart Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Stewart Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
(citing the former A.R.S.
State of Arizona v. Raymond Anthony Hall 322 P.3d 191 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
State of Arizona v. Raymond Anthony Hall 322 P.3d 191 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2014
¶10 In situations where a general statute conflicts with a specific one, “the specific governs.”
State of Arizona v. Max Valencia Chavez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
State of Arizona v. Max Valencia Chavez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
See, -12, -24 (1973); People v. Leighton, 177 Cal.
Gonzalez v. Satrustegui 870 P.2d 1188 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Gonzalez v. Satrustegui 870 P.2d 1188 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
Escalanti v. Department of Corrections 851 P.2d 151 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Escalanti v. Department of Corrections 851 P.2d 151 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
Alexander v. Fund Manager, Public Safety Personnel Retirement System 804 P.2d 122 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
Alexander v. Fund Manager, Public Safety Personnel Retirement System 804 P.2d 122 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
State v. Wagstaff 794 P.2d 118 Ariz. 1990
In Re Pima County Juvenile Appeal No. 74802-2 790 P.2d 723 Ariz. 1990
In Re Pima County Juvenile Appeal No. 74802-2 790 P.2d 723 Ariz. 1990
see People v. Superior Court of Los Angeles County, 70 Cal.2d 123, 132-33 , , 74 Cal.Rptr.
State v. Lee 774 P.2d 228 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
State v. Lee 774 P.2d 228 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
-14 , -26 (1973) (defendant would be entitled to the statutory deductions from his minimum sentence and eligible for parole prior to the expiration of the seventy-five-year minimum sentence imposed in that case).
State v. Davis 712 P.2d 975 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
State v. Davis 712 P.2d 975 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
The credits provided for in those two statutes are matters of statutory right, , and may only be forfeited in accordance with the provisions of those statutes.
ARIZONA NEWSPAPERS ASS'N. v. Superior Court 694 P.2d 1174 Ariz. 1985
ARIZONA NEWSPAPERS ASS'N. v. Superior Court 694 P.2d 1174 Ariz. 1985
Sellinger v. Freeway Mobile Home Sales, Inc., , P.2d 1222 (1973).
Lemons v. Superior Court of Gila County 687 P.2d 1257 Ariz. 1984
Lemons v. Superior Court of Gila County 687 P.2d 1257 Ariz. 1984
New Pueblo Constructors, Inc. v. State 696 P.2d 203 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
New Pueblo Constructors, Inc. v. State 696 P.2d 203 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1984
State v. Pena 683 P.2d 744 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
State v. Pena 683 P.2d 744 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
Arizona Downs v. Arizona Horsemen's Foundation 637 P.2d 1053 Ariz. 1981
Arizona Downs v. Arizona Horsemen's Foundation 637 P.2d 1053 Ariz. 1981
State v. McGann 645 P.2d 837 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
State v. McGann 645 P.2d 837 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
State v. Walden 615 P.2d 11 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
State v. Walden 615 P.2d 11 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
the supreme court remanded for re-sentencing where the record was clear that the sentencing judge had erroneously applied the law governing parole eligibility and had relied upon that erroneous eompu- *336 tation in determining the sentence.
State v. Barnard 612 P.2d 1073 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
State v. Barnard 612 P.2d 1073 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
Watson v. Industrial Commission, supra, , relied upon by petitioner are inapposite.
Jones v. Manhart 585 P.2d 1250 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
Jones v. Manhart 585 P.2d 1250 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
E. g., , National Union Fire Ins.
State v. Canez 575 P.2d 817 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
State v. Canez 575 P.2d 817 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
State v. O'NEILL 572 P.2d 1181 Ariz. 1977