DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Cooper, 529 P.2d 231.

35 citing documents.

  • State v. Loader Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • State v. Loader Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
  • State v. McKeon 38 P.3d 1236 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
  • State v. Amaya-Ruiz 800 P.2d 1260 Ariz. 1990
  • State v. Amaya-Ruiz 800 P.2d 1260 Ariz. 1990
    irrational conduct.” , , (emphasis in original).
  • State v. Tallabas 746 P.2d 491 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
  • State v. Tallabas 746 P.2d 491 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
  • State v. Venegas 669 P.2d 604 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
  • State v. Venegas 669 P.2d 604 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
    See also United States v. Burnim, 576 F.2d 236 (9th Cir.1978) (mental disability must have been brought about by circumstances beyond the control of the actor before one can find insanity); , (a temporary episode of mental incapacity caused by voluntary use of liquor is not a defense to crime, except to show lack of specific intent); , (where a person drinks intoxicating liquor and is sane both prior to drinking and after the influen
  • State v. Jeffers 661 P.2d 1105 Ariz. 1983
  • State v. Jeffers 661 P.2d 1105 Ariz. 1983
  • State v. Moreno 625 P.2d 320 Ariz. 1981
  • State v. Moreno 625 P.2d 320 Ariz. 1981
  • State v. Curry 617 P.2d 785 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
  • State v. Curry 617 P.2d 785 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
    Although appellant’s , this does not automatically establish its suitability as an instruction.
  • State v. Gretzler 612 P.2d 1023 Ariz. 1980
  • State v. Laffoon 610 P.2d 1045 Ariz. 1980
  • State v. Laffoon 610 P.2d 1045 Ariz. 1980
  • State v. Gretzler 612 P.2d 1023 Ariz. 1980
    See also State v. Steelman, supra
  • State v. Steelman 585 P.2d 1213 Ariz. 1978
  • State v. Steelman 585 P.2d 1213 Ariz. 1978
  • State v. Fields 572 P.2d 453 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
  • State v. Fields 572 P.2d 453 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
  • State v. Tramble 568 P.2d 1147 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
  • State v. Tramble 568 P.2d 1147 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
    “The voluntary actions of the defendant do not provide an excuse in law for his irrational conduct.”
  • State v. Means 566 P.2d 303 Ariz. 1977
  • State v. Means 566 P.2d 303 Ariz. 1977
  • State v. Valenzuela 559 P.2d 201 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
  • State v. Valenzuela 559 P.2d 201 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
  • State v. Parker 558 P.2d 905 Ariz. 1976
  • State v. Parker 558 P.2d 905 Ariz. 1976
    : “There is a presumption of sanity in every criminal case.
  • State v. Owens 557 P.2d 562 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
  • State v. Owens 557 P.2d 562 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
    See: , Crow v. Eyman, 459 F.2d 24 (9th Cir. 1972), cert.
  • State v. Dante 541 P.2d 941 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1975
  • State v. Dante 541 P.2d 941 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1975
    that voluntary intoxication will not be permitted to support the defense of insanity even if the evidence discloses that the defendant did not know the nature and quality of his acts at the time of the acts charged.