Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Gamble, 523 P.2d 53.

33 citing documents.

State v. Boles 905 P.2d 572 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
State v. Boles 905 P.2d 572 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
An error is fundamental if it disrupts “the foundation of the case or takes from the defendant a right essential to his defense.” Thomas, 130 Ariz. at 435 , 636 P.2d at 1217 ( ).
State v. Arnoldi 860 P.2d 503 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1993
State v. Arnoldi 860 P.2d 503 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1993
Fundamental error is error that “goes to the foundation of the case or takes from a defendant a right essential to Ms defense.”
State v. Georgeoff 788 P.2d 1185 Ariz. 1990
State v. Georgeoff 788 P.2d 1185 Ariz. 1990
As we have previously stated: Error is fundamental when it reaches “ ‘the foundation of the case or takes from the defendant a right essential to his defense,’ ” or is an “ ‘error of such dimensions that it cannot be said it is possible for a defendant to have had a fair trial.’ ” -36 , -18 (1982) ( , , ).
State v. Serna 787 P.2d 1056 Ariz. 1990
State v. Serna 787 P.2d 1056 Ariz. 1990
*267 Error is fundamental when it reaches “the foundation of the case or takes from the defendant a right essential to his defense,” , or is an “error of such dimension that it cannot be said it is possible for a defendant to have had a fair trial.”
State v. Walton 769 P.2d 1017 Ariz. 1989
State v. Walton 769 P.2d 1017 Ariz. 1989
State v. King 763 P.2d 239 Ariz. 1988
State v. King 763 P.2d 239 Ariz. 1988
Error is fundamental when it reaches “ ‘the foundation of the case or takes from the defendant a right essential to his defense,’ ” or is an “ ‘error of such dimensions that it cannot be said it is possible for a defendant to have had a fair trial.’ ” -36 , -18 (1982) ( , , ).
State v. Allen 755 P.2d 1153 Ariz. 1988
State v. Allen 755 P.2d 1153 Ariz. 1988
Fundamental error is defined as “such error as goes to the foundation of the case or takes from a defendant a right essential to his defense.”
State v. Garcia 731 P.2d 610 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
State v. Garcia 731 P.2d 610 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
State v. Stone 728 P.2d 674 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
State v. Stone 728 P.2d 674 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
The court noted: Fundamental error has been variously defined by this court as ‘such error as goes to the foundation of the case or takes from the defendant a right essential to his defense,’ , and as ‘error of such dimensions that it cannot be said it is impossible for a defendant to have had a fair trial.’
State v. Tyler 718 P.2d 214 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
State v. Fendler 622 P.2d 23 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
State v. Fendler 622 P.2d 23 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
While it is a fundamental principle of law that a defendant is entitled to an instruction on a defensive theory for which there is any foundation in the evidence, , P.2d 53 (1974); there was no evidence presented at trial that appellant or anyone else ever consulted attorney David M. West or any other counsel concerning the propriety of the entries associated with adjusting journal entry 74-1.
State v. Mata 609 P.2d 48 Ariz. 1980
State v. Mata 609 P.2d 48 Ariz. 1980
State v. Stanley 597 P.2d 998 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
State v. Stanley 597 P.2d 998 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
Fundamental error is “ ‘such error as goes to the foundation of the case, or which takes from the defendant a right essential to his defense.’ ”
State v. Ethington 592 P.2d 768 Ariz. 1979
State v. Ethington 592 P.2d 768 Ariz. 1979
Fundamental error is “such error as goes to the foundation of the case, or which takes from the defendant a right essential to his defense.”
State v. Para 583 P.2d 1346 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
State v. Para 583 P.2d 1346 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
where the inadequate instruction did not prejudice the defendant.
State v. Bean 581 P.2d 257 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
State v. Bean 581 P.2d 257 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
State v. Collins 528 P.2d 829 Ariz. 1974
State v. Collins 528 P.2d 829 Ariz. 1974