Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Jaramillo, 520 P.2d 1105.
- State v. Walker 891 P.2d 942 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
-
State v. Walker
891 P.2d 942
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1995
that’s why we are here today, to convict the defendant of this”); , (no error in argument to jury, “You will never in any of your lifetime have a better opportunity to do something about the drug problem, particularly about heroin sellers, than you’ve got here today in court.”).
- State v. Hernandez 823 P.2d 1309 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
- State v. Hernandez 823 P.2d 1309 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
- State v. Eisenlord 670 P.2d 1209 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
- State v. Eisenlord 670 P.2d 1209 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
- State v. Jahns 653 P.2d 19 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
- State v. Jahns 653 P.2d 19 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
- State v. Sullivan 635 P.2d 501 Ariz. 1981
- State v. Morgan 625 P.2d 951 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
- State v. Morgan 625 P.2d 951 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
- State v. Carrillo 626 P.2d 1100 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
- State v. Carrillo 626 P.2d 1100 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
- State v. Canisales 615 P.2d 9 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
-
State v. Canisales
615 P.2d 9
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
State v. Scott, 24 Ariz.App.
- State v. Marvin 606 P.2d 406 Ariz. 1980
- State v. Marvin 606 P.2d 406 Ariz. 1980
- State v. Contreras 595 P.2d 1023 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
- State v. Contreras 595 P.2d 1023 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
- State v. Smith 561 P.2d 739 Ariz. 1977
- State v. Smith 561 P.2d 739 Ariz. 1977
- State v. Landrum 544 P.2d 664 Ariz. 1976
- State v. Landrum 544 P.2d 664 Ariz. 1976
- State v. Moore 540 P.2d 1252 Ariz. 1975
-
Followed
State v. Moore
540 P.2d 1252
Ariz. 1975
2d 832 (1971) this Court held that reference by the prosecuting attorney in his argument to the prevalence of crime is not improper; further that the prosecuting attorney has a right to call attention to the prevalence of crime (crime rate), to urge the jury to do its duty and uphold the law, and to draw inferences from conditions resulting from the failure to uphold the law.” -484 , -1108 (1974).
- State v. Gastelo 532 P.2d 521 Ariz. 1975
- State v. Gastelo 532 P.2d 521 Ariz. 1975
- State v. Juarez 524 P.2d 155 Ariz. 1974
- State v. Juarez 524 P.2d 155 Ariz. 1974
- State v. Jaramillo 522 P.2d 1079 Ariz. 1974
- State v. Jaramillo 522 P.2d 1079 Ariz. 1974
- State v. Miniefield 522 P.2d 25 Ariz. 1974
- State v. Miniefield 522 P.2d 25 Ariz. 1974