Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Kelly, 526 P.2d 720.

108 citing documents.

State v. Bruni 630 P.2d 1044 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
State v. Bruni 630 P.2d 1044 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
Although the introduction into evidence of mug shots or the mention of the fact that the police had photos of the defendant taken sometime before the crime can be error when it infers a prior arrest, , cert.
State v. Verive 627 P.2d 721 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
State v. Verive 627 P.2d 721 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
This factual question could have been developed had the defense counsel afforded the trial judge an opportunity to consider the matter, , cert.
State v. Seip 623 P.2d 845 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
State v. Seip 623 P.2d 845 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
State v. Jackson 603 P.2d 94 Ariz. 1979
State v. Jackson 603 P.2d 94 Ariz. 1979
State v. Cross 600 P.2d 1126 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
State v. Cross 600 P.2d 1126 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
the error here was not harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.
State v. Reinhold 597 P.2d 532 Ariz. 1979
State v. Reinhold 597 P.2d 532 Ariz. 1979
In support of this proposition, , cert.
State v. Newman 595 P.2d 665 Ariz. 1979
State v. Newman 595 P.2d 665 Ariz. 1979
State v. Gray 595 P.2d 990 Ariz. 1979
State v. Gray 595 P.2d 990 Ariz. 1979
State v. Grice 597 P.2d 548 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
State v. Grice 597 P.2d 548 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
Parker v. State 591 P.2d 569 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
Matter of One 1965 Ford Econoline Van, Etc. 591 P.2d 569 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
Matter of One 1965 Ford Econoline Van, Etc. 591 P.2d 569 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
Parker v. State 591 P.2d 569 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
cert, denied, 420 U.S. 935 , 95 S.Ct.
State v. Binford 584 P.2d 67 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
State v. Binford 584 P.2d 67 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
State v. Mosley 581 P.2d 238 Ariz. 1978
State v. Mosley 581 P.2d 238 Ariz. 1978
State v. Leeman 581 P.2d 693 Ariz. 1978
State v. Leeman 581 P.2d 693 Ariz. 1978
State v. Norcross, supra; See also State v. Scofield, supra.
State v. Arnett 579 P.2d 542 Ariz. 1978
State v. Arnett 579 P.2d 542 Ariz. 1978
: “The Fourteenth Amendment does not deny a state the power to treat different classes of persons in different ways as long as the classification is reasonable.
State v. Myers 570 P.2d 1252 Ariz. 1977
State v. Myers 570 P.2d 1252 Ariz. 1977
Eastin v. Broomfield 570 P.2d 744 Ariz. 1977
Eastin v. Broomfield 570 P.2d 744 Ariz. 1977
State v. Fears 570 P.2d 181 Ariz. 1977
State v. Fears 570 P.2d 181 Ariz. 1977
State v. Henderson 569 P.2d 252 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
State v. Henderson 569 P.2d 252 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
State v. Perry 567 P.2d 786 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
State v. Perry 567 P.2d 786 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
State v. Spain 558 P.2d 947 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1976
State v. Spain 558 P.2d 947 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1976
State v. Morris 548 P.2d 435 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1976
State v. Morris 548 P.2d 435 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1976
cited by appellant is not in point.
State v. Noles 546 P.2d 814 Ariz. 1976
State v. Noles 546 P.2d 814 Ariz. 1976
We have also stated: “ * * * when the evidence tends to establish intent, absence of mistake, or accident, identity, and common scheme or plan, it may be admissible even if the evidence also shows evidence of misconduct or prior bad acts.”
State v. Dale 544 P.2d 241 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1975
State v. Dale 544 P.2d 241 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1975
Gillard v. Estrella Dells I Improvement District 541 P.2d 932 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975
Gillard v. Estrella Dells I Improvement District 541 P.2d 932 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1975