Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Rogers, 545 P.2d 930.

25 citing documents.

State v. Williams Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
State v. Williams Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
P. 32.6(d); (noting the “liberal policy toward amendments of post-conviction pleadings”), Williams moved for rehearing, see Ariz. R. Crim.
State v. Chavez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Chavez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
¶9 The law is clear that a “person cannot be convicted of an offense not charged against him by indictment or information.”
State v. Maldonado 219 P.3d 1050 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
State v. Maldonado 219 P.3d 1050 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
Canion v. Cole 115 P.3d 1261 Ariz. 2005
Canion v. Cole 115 P.3d 1261 Ariz. 2005
Rule 32 not only provides a procedure through which a defendant may be heard, but also ensures a record from which reviewing courts can determine whether the facts “support petitioner’s claim for relief.” (Cameron, J., dissenting).
State v. Buckley 734 P.2d 1047 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
State v. Buckley 734 P.2d 1047 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1987
State v. Scrivner 643 P.2d 1022 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
State v. Scrivner 643 P.2d 1022 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
State v. Ramirez 616 P.2d 924 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
State v. Ramirez 616 P.2d 924 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
State v. Wilson 615 P.2d 645 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
State v. Wilson 615 P.2d 645 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
State v. Scrivner 611 P.2d 95 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
State v. Scrivner 611 P.2d 95 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
State v. Drozd 569 P.2d 272 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
State v. Drozd 569 P.2d 272 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
State v. Wood 564 P.2d 405 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
State v. Wood 564 P.2d 405 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
As to the availability of post-conviction relief, , , State v. Rios, 27 Ariz.App.
State v. Sims 560 P.2d 810 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
State v. Sims 560 P.2d 810 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
State v. DeGraw 550 P.2d 641 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976