Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Finn, 528 P.2d 615.

108 citing documents.

State v. Tabor Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Tabor Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Stroble Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Stroble Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Miller Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Miller Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Benally Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Benally Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Remy-Apodaca Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Remy-Apodaca Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
-20, -44 (1977) (finding no error in lack of voluntariness hearing where defendant did not object to admission of his statements)
State v. Bennett Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Bennett Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Toledo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Toledo Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Smith Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Smith Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Guarino Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Guarino Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Wade Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Wade Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Smith 762 P.2d 509 Ariz. 1988
State v. Smith 762 P.2d 509 Ariz. 1988
Mongan v. Pima County Superior Court 715 P.2d 739 Ariz. 1986
Mongan v. Pima County Superior Court 715 P.2d 739 Ariz. 1986
(right to counsel) , (right to remain silent).
Mongan v. Pima County Superior Court 715 P.2d 764 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
Mongan v. Pima County Superior Court 715 P.2d 764 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1985
(right to remain silent); , (unreasonable search).
State v. Martin 663 P.2d 236 Ariz. 1983
State v. Martin 663 P.2d 236 Ariz. 1983
Udall & Livermore, Arizona Law of Evidence, § 124 at 251 (2d ed. 1982).
State v. Grier 630 P.2d 575 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
State v. Grier 630 P.2d 575 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
State v. Smith, supra; , , vacated in part regarding another issue
State v. Parker 624 P.2d 304 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
State v. Parker 624 P.2d 304 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
State v. Post 592 P.2d 775 Ariz. 1979
State v. Post 592 P.2d 775 Ariz. 1979
State v. Alvarado 591 P.2d 973 Ariz. 1979
State v. Alvarado 591 P.2d 973 Ariz. 1979
State v. Williams 589 P.2d 456 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
State v. Williams 589 P.2d 456 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
the court held that the following testimony did not necessarily indicate the defendant had previously had trouble with the police, and so did not require a reversal: “ ‘Q. Did you have occasion to talk to Mr. Finn about where he had been?
State v. Ferguson 580 P.2d 338 Ariz. 1978
State v. Ferguson 580 P.2d 338 Ariz. 1978
State v. McGriff, 7 Ariz.App.
State v. Garner 569 P.2d 1341 Ariz. 1977
State v. Garner 569 P.2d 1341 Ariz. 1977
Ray Korte Chevrolet v. Simmons 571 P.2d 699 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
Ray Korte Chevrolet v. Simmons 571 P.2d 699 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
Further, , that when such testimony is allowed for the purpose of corroboration, rehabilitation testimony is admissible for its substance as well.
State v. Sutton 565 P.2d 1278 Ariz. 1977
State v. Sutton 565 P.2d 1278 Ariz. 1977
holding that the trial court was not required to order a voluntariness hearing when the question of involuntariness was neither raised by counsel nor implied from the evidence.
State v. Smith 561 P.2d 739 Ariz. 1977
State v. Smith 561 P.2d 739 Ariz. 1977
State v. Sutton 551 P.2d 583 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
State v. Sutton 551 P.2d 583 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976