Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Jackson, 539 P.2d 906.

38 citing documents.

State v. Cowled Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Cowled Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Hudson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
State v. Hudson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2020
“A motion for continuance is not granted as a matter of right,” and “is solely within the sound discretion of the trial judge.”
State v. Martineau Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Martineau Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
State v. Denson 382 P.3d 1221 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
State v. Denson 382 P.3d 1221 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2016
(holding officers had probable cause to arrest for burglary in part because victim reported seeing a flashlight being used in his home, and officers found a flashlight and pair of gloves in defendant’s ear); State v. O’Laughlin, ¶ 16 , (
State v. Cotham Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Cotham Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Moton Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Moton Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State v. Bloomer 751 P.2d 592 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
State v. Bloomer 751 P.2d 592 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1987
State v. Eisenlord 670 P.2d 1209 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
State v. Eisenlord 670 P.2d 1209 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
State v. DeRosier 650 P.2d 456 Ariz. 1982
State v. DeRosier 650 P.2d 456 Ariz. 1982
State v. Greenawalt 624 P.2d 828 Ariz. 1981
State v. Greenawalt 624 P.2d 828 Ariz. 1981
State v. Laffoon 610 P.2d 1045 Ariz. 1980
State v. Laffoon 610 P.2d 1045 Ariz. 1980
we said: The trial judge has this discretion because he is the only unbiased party to an action in a position to observe the proceeding with an unjaundiced eye.
State v. Jones 599 P.2d 826 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
State v. Jones 599 P.2d 826 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
State v. Loyd 574 P.2d 1325 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
State v. Loyd 574 P.2d 1325 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
State v. Ortiz 571 P.2d 1060 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
State v. Ortiz 571 P.2d 1060 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
State v. Goettel 572 P.2d 115 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
State v. Goettel 572 P.2d 115 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
1234 , 39 L.Ed.2d 771 (1974)
State v. Myers 570 P.2d 1252 Ariz. 1977
State v. Myers 570 P.2d 1252 Ariz. 1977
State v. Griffin 570 P.2d 1067 Ariz. 1977
State v. Griffin 570 P.2d 1067 Ariz. 1977
State v. Lamb 568 P.2d 1032 Ariz. 1977
State v. Lamb 568 P.2d 1032 Ariz. 1977
Such a motion is not granted as a matter of right, , and we will not interfere with the trial court’s ruling unless there is a clear abuse of discretion and a showing of prejudice to the defendant.
State v. Henderson 569 P.2d 252 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
State v. Henderson 569 P.2d 252 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
State v. Babineaux, 22 Ariz.App.