Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Riley, 992 P.2d 1135.

83 citing documents.

State v. Miles 123 P.3d 669 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
State of Arizona v. Jay David Ramsey, Sr. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
State v. Miles 123 P.3d 669 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
State of Arizona v. Renee Sue Ruggiero Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
State of Arizona v. Renee Sue Ruggiero Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
State of Arizona v. Kenneth Allen May Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
State of Arizona v. Kenneth Allen May Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
State of Arizona v. Tyla Naureen Poshka Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
State of Arizona v. Tyla Naureen Poshka Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
State of Arizona v. Derek Scott Oaks Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
State of Arizona v. Derek Scott Oaks Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2005
State of Arizona v. Oscar Manuel Lopez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
State of Arizona v. Oscar Manuel Lopez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
State v. Watkins 88 P.3d 1174 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
State v. Watkins 88 P.3d 1174 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
See, e.g., United States v. Brown, 273 F.3d 747, 748-49 (7th Cir.2001) (finding a pat-down supported, in part, by the suspect’s hand movements near his lap area); ¶ 16 , (movement toward the waistband in response to a question about weapons meant officer had a justifiable concern for his safety and thus a pat-down was valid).
State v. Stroud 88 P.3d 190 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
State v. Stroud 88 P.3d 190 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
State of Arizona v. Lenny M. Box Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
State of Arizona v. Lenny M. Box Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
Florida v. Royer, 460 U.S. 491, 103 S. Ct. 1319, 75 L. Ed. 2d 229 (1983); (Terry stops tolerated absent probable cause because “they are brief and as narrowly circumscribed as possible”); P.2d 1135 (App. 1999) (continued detention of passenger following driver’s arrest justified by reasonable suspicion).
State of Arizona v. Victor David Rodriguez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
State of Arizona v. Victor David Rodriguez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
State of Arizona v. Tyrone Vaughn Henry Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
State of Arizona v. Tyrone Vaughn Henry Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
State v. Moore 56 P.3d 1099 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
State v. Moore 56 P.3d 1099 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
¶ 15 Although a violation of the Confrontation Clause may be harmless error, ¶ 9 , we cannot conclude that the error here was harmless.
State of Arizona v. Alice C. Jeffrey Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
State of Arizona v. Alice C. Jeffrey Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
State v. Korovkin 47 P.3d 1131 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
State v. Korovkin 47 P.3d 1131 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
State of Arizona v. Powers 23 P.3d 668 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001
State of Arizona v. Powers 23 P.3d 668 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001
State v. Rutledge 4 P.3d 444 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
Criticized State v. Rutledge 4 P.3d 444 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000