Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite Norgord v. State Ex Rel. Berning, 33 P.3d 1166.

55 citing documents.

Ncr Investments v. Maxfield Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2025
Berning, ¶ 4 (App. 2001).
McMichael-gombar v. Phoenix Civil Service Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
McMichael-gombar v. Phoenix Civil Service Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Berning, ¶ 4 (App. 2001)).
siete/mesquite v. ador/mar Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
siete/mesquite v. ador/mar Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
-31, ¶ 7 (App. 2001) (stating that when interpreting a statute we consider the context including how the statute in question relates to the entire regulatory scheme).
State v. Hon. stephens/wilson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Hon. stephens/wilson Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Berning, ¶ 21, (upholding victim’s right to refuse pre-trial interview); (noting that although there is no general federal constitutional right to discovery, “the Constitution does impose on the prosecution a due process obli
State of Arizona v. Marshall Neal Ray 355 P.3d 621 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
State of Arizona v. Marshall Neal Ray 355 P.3d 621 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2015
DBT Yuma, L.L.C. v. Yuma County Airport Authority 340 P.3d 1080 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
DBT Yuma, L.L.C. v. Yuma County Airport Authority 340 P.3d 1080 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2014
State of Arizona v. Mark Dwayne Gannon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
State of Arizona v. Mark Dwayne Gannon Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2011
Berning, 201 Ariz. 228, ¶ 7, quoting Hobson v. Mid-Century Ins.
State v. Latham 219 P.3d 280 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
State v. Latham 219 P.3d 280 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2009
STATE EX REL. BRANNAN v. Williams 171 P.3d 1248 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
STATE EX REL. BRANNAN v. Williams 171 P.3d 1248 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Berning, ¶ 8 , *211 (concluding placement of indecent exposure statute in “Sexual Offenses” chapter of Criminal Code suggests legislature intended to classify indecent exposure as sexual offense).
State v. Connor 161 P.3d 596 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
State v. Connor 161 P.3d 596 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Berning, ¶21 , quoting State v. O’Neil, , (“It is well-established that there is neither a federal nor a state constitutional right to pretrial discovery”) ¶22 Nevertheless, consistent with due process, when the defendant demonstrates a suffici
Stewart v. Carroll 154 P.3d 382 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Stewart v. Carroll 154 P.3d 382 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
Stein v. Sonus USA, Inc. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
Stein v. Sonus USA, Inc. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2007
Associated Aviation Underwriters v. Wood 98 P.3d 572 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
Associated Aviation Underwriters v. Wood 98 P.3d 572 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2004
Merlina v. Jejna 90 P.3d 202 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Merlina v. Jejna 90 P.3d 202 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
State of Arizona v. Victor David Rodriguez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
State of Arizona v. Victor David Rodriguez Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
Berning, quoting Hobson v. Mid-Century Ins.
Arizona Libertarian Party, Inc. v. Board of Supervisors 70 P.3d 1146 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
Arizona Libertarian Party, Inc. v. Board of Supervisors 70 P.3d 1146 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
McMURREN v. JMC BUILDERS Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
McMURREN v. JMC BUILDERS Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
Cranmer v. State 63 P.3d 1036 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
State of Arizona v. Cranmer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
State of Arizona v. Cranmer Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
Cranmer v. State 63 P.3d 1036 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2003
State of Arizona v. Amiel Proto 58 P.3d 33 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
State of Arizona v. Amiel Proto 58 P.3d 33 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
Berning, quoting Hobson v. Mid-Century Ins.
Tornabene v. Bonine Ex Rel. Arizona Highway Department 54 P.3d 355 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
Tornabene v. Bonine Ex Rel. Arizona Highway Department 54 P.3d 355 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
State v. Fell 52 P.3d 218 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
State v. Fell 52 P.3d 218 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
Moore v. Browning 50 P.3d 852 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
Moore v. Browning 50 P.3d 852 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
State v. Siddle 47 P.3d 1150 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
State v. Siddle 47 P.3d 1150 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
McMann v. City of Tucson 47 P.3d 672 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2002
State v. Sorkhabi 46 P.3d 1071 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002
State v. Sorkhabi 46 P.3d 1071 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2002