Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Jameson, 541 P.2d 912.

48 citing documents.

State v. Flemming 907 P.2d 496 Ariz. 1995
State v. Flemming 907 P.2d 496 Ariz. 1995
This court has previously expressed “disapproval of the practice of deferring the hearing on probation revocation until after the adjudication of guilt or innocence on the new criminal charge____”
State v. Ojeda 769 P.2d 1006 Ariz. 1989
State v. Ojeda 769 P.2d 1006 Ariz. 1989
State v. Ojeda 764 P.2d 350 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
State v. Ojeda 764 P.2d 350 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
State v. Wilson 724 P.2d 1271 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
State v. Wilson 724 P.2d 1271 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1986
State v. Love 711 P.2d 1240 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
State v. Love 711 P.2d 1240 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1985
State v. Fahringer 666 P.2d 514 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
State v. Fahringer 666 P.2d 514 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
the court stated: “Finally, we express disapproval of the practice of deferring the hearing on probation revocation until after the adjudication of guilt or innocence on the criminal charge when both proceedings are based upon the same facts.
State v. Morales 668 P.2d 910 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
State v. Morales 668 P.2d 910 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
Green v. SUPERIOR COURT, ETC. 647 P.2d 166 Ariz. 1982
Green v. SUPERIOR COURT, ETC. 647 P.2d 166 Ariz. 1982
1756 , 36 L.Ed.2d 656 (1973)
State v. Williams 639 P.2d 1043 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
State v. Williams 639 P.2d 1043 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
which involves the converse of the proceed *222 ings here, that is, the defendant was first prosecuted for possession of a stolen vehicle, which prosecution was dismissed.
State v. Velazquez 593 P.2d 304 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
State v. Velazquez 593 P.2d 304 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
State v. LeMatty 590 P.2d 449 Ariz. 1979
State v. LeMatty 590 P.2d 449 Ariz. 1979
State v. Long 580 P.2d 1181 Ariz. 1978
State v. Long 580 P.2d 1181 Ariz. 1978
3 State v. Salinas, 23 Ariz.App.
State v. Timpson 581 P.2d 698 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
State v. Timpson 581 P.2d 698 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
In Re Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. J-83341-S 580 P.2d 10 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
In Re Appeal in Maricopa County Juvenile Action No. J-83341-S 580 P.2d 10 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
State v. Simmerman 576 P.2d 157 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
State v. Simmerman 576 P.2d 157 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
1268 , 31 L.Ed.2d 463 (1972); , and authorities cited therein.
State v. Carter 570 P.2d 763 Ariz. 1977
State v. Carter 570 P.2d 763 Ariz. 1977
Rules of Criminal Procedure, rule 27.7(b)(3); State v. Smith, supra
State v. Rivera 569 P.2d 1347 Ariz. 1977
State v. Rivera 569 P.2d 1347 Ariz. 1977
State v. Rodriguez 569 P.2d 218 Ariz. 1977
State v. Rodriguez 569 P.2d 218 Ariz. 1977
State v. Tubbs 568 P.2d 1144 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
State v. Tubbs 568 P.2d 1144 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
State v. Hadley, supra; State v. Baylis, supra.
State v. Gray 564 P.2d 101 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
State v. Gray 564 P.2d 101 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1977
in which the supreme court of this state expressly disapproved the practice of deferring the hearing on probation revocation until after the adjudication of guilt or innocence on the criminal charge when both proceedings are based upon the same facts.
State v. Fuentes 549 P.2d 224 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
State v. Fuentes 549 P.2d 224 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
In reaching this result, I
State v. Flores 549 P.2d 180 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
State v. Flores 549 P.2d 180 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
(probation officer testified that he was informed by the police department that the probationer had been arrested and charged with carrying a weapon) ; State v. Salinas, 23 Ariz.App.
State v. Astorga 547 P.2d 1060 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1976
State v. Astorga 547 P.2d 1060 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1976
2 , does not operate to invalidate the revocation.
State v. Superior Court 544 P.2d 276 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1976
State v. Superior Court 544 P.2d 276 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1976
Comment, Rule 27.7(d), Rules of Criminal Procedure