Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Reid, 559 P.2d 136.

73 citing documents.

State v. Gomes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
State v. Gomes Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2022
Ross v. Oklahoma, 487 U.S. 81, 88–89 (1988)
Claudia Patricia Higuera v. State of Arizona 383 P.3d 1150 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
Claudia Patricia Higuera v. State of Arizona 383 P.3d 1150 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2016
“[T]he granting of a peremptory challenge to obtain a change of judge as a matter of right is a challenge which is given as a matter of grace under the Rules, and is to be distinguished from a disqualification of a judge based upon cause.” (no constitutional right to peremptory change of judge).
State of Arizona v. Rodney Eugene Hardy 283 P.3d 12 Ariz. 2012
State of Arizona v. Rodney Eugene Hardy 283 P.3d 12 Ariz. 2012
Deck, 544 U.S. at 635; State v. Reid, 114 Ariz. 16, 23
State of Arizona v. Nathan Andres Leyvas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
State of Arizona v. Nathan Andres Leyvas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2009
-26, -46 (1976) (trial court should have held pretrial evidentiary hearing, 8 ¶15 First, as noted above, the court in Dessureault stated that, “if at the trial the proposed in-court identification is challenged, the trial judge must immedi
State v. Montaño 65 P.3d 61 Ariz. 2003
State v. Montaño 65 P.3d 61 Ariz. 2003
§§ 13-4081 to -4083 (2001) (describing the circumstances and procedures by which an uncharged witness can be held in custody); -25 , -45 (1976).
State v. Talmadge 999 P.2d 192 Ariz. 2000
State v. Talmadge 999 P.2d 192 Ariz. 2000
State v. Mills 995 P.2d 705 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1999
State v. Mills 995 P.2d 705 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1999
State v. Jones 937 P.2d 1182 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
State v. Bible 858 P.2d 1152 Ariz. 1993
State v. Bible 858 P.2d 1152 Ariz. 1993
State v. Vaughn 786 P.2d 1051 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
State v. Vaughn 786 P.2d 1051 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1989
State v. Fulminante 778 P.2d 602 Ariz. 1989
State v. Fulminante 778 P.2d 602 Ariz. 1989
State v. Bracy 703 P.2d 464 Ariz. 1985
State v. Bracy 703 P.2d 464 Ariz. 1985
State v. Stewart 676 P.2d 1108 Ariz. 1984
State v. Stewart 676 P.2d 1108 Ariz. 1984
State v. Harding 670 P.2d 383 Ariz. 1983
State v. Harding 670 P.2d 383 Ariz. 1983
The court noted *289 , cert.
State v. Stewart 676 P.2d 1124 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
State v. Stewart 676 P.2d 1124 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
State v. Keel 672 P.2d 197 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
State v. Keel 672 P.2d 197 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
1498 , 55 L.Ed.2d 524 (1978); , , cert.
State v. Lujan 666 P.2d 71 Ariz. 1983
State v. Lujan 666 P.2d 71 Ariz. 1983
State v. Grijalva 667 P.2d 1336 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
State v. Grijalva 667 P.2d 1336 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
State v. Bishop 667 P.2d 1331 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
State v. Bishop 667 P.2d 1331 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
State v. Stewart 676 P.2d 1124 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
State v. Stewart 676 P.2d 1124 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
State v. Melendez 661 P.2d 654 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
State v. Melendez 661 P.2d 654 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1982
State v. Watson 653 P.2d 351 Ariz. 1982
State v. Watson 653 P.2d 351 Ariz. 1982
1254 , 59 L.Ed.2d 478 (1979), appeal after remand, , , describing robberies committed by Spencer Watson and Timothy Reid on May 30, 1974, using the same modus operandi used by the robbers in this case.
State v. Hartford 651 P.2d 856 Ariz. 1982
State v. Hartford 651 P.2d 856 Ariz. 1982
784 , 17 L.Ed.2d 687 (1967)
State v. Jessen 633 P.2d 410 Ariz. 1981
State v. Jessen 633 P.2d 410 Ariz. 1981
-30 , State v. Nunez, 23 Ariz.App.
State v. Watson 628 P.2d 943 Ariz. 1981
State v. Watson 628 P.2d 943 Ariz. 1981
Also, when we consider the age of the defendant at the time of the murder (21), the fact that the evidence supports a finding that the victim shot first (twice), see Watson I, 114 Ariz. at 4, 559 P.2d at 124 , and that the codefendant, Timothy Reid, received a life sentence rather than death, , cert.
State v. Ferreira 627 P.2d 681 Ariz. 1981