Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Torrez, 544 P.2d 207.
- State v. MacIas Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
-
State v. MacIas
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
“Where facts are indicated so that the magistrate may conclude that the activity is of a continuous nature or in a course of conduct, the passage of time becomes less significant.” ().
- State v. Peterson 830 P.2d 854 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
-
State v. Peterson
830 P.2d 854
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1991
Probable cause to arrest exists if the police have “reasonable grounds to believe that an offense is being or has been committed by the person arrested____” , ( , cert.
- State v. Wiley 698 P.2d 1244 Ariz. 1985
- State v. Lawson 698 P.2d 1266 Ariz. 1985
-
State v. Lawson
698 P.2d 1266
Ariz. 1985
We have stated that a police officer has probable cause for an arrest if he has “reasonable grounds to believe that an offense is being or has been committed by the person arrested * * , cert.
-
State v. Wiley
698 P.2d 1244
Ariz. 1985
We have stated that a police officer has probable cause for an arrest if he has “reasonable grounds to believe that an offense is being or has been committed by the person arrested * * , cert.
- State v. Martin 679 P.2d 489 Ariz. 1984
- State v. Martin 679 P.2d 489 Ariz. 1984
- State v. McCall 677 P.2d 920 Ariz. 1983
-
State v. McCall
677 P.2d 920
Ariz. 1983
See United States v. Lucarz, 430 F.2d 1051 (9th Cir.1970); , cert.
- State v. Turney 655 P.2d 358 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
- State v. Turney 655 P.2d 358 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1982
- State v. Hale 641 P.2d 1288 Ariz. 1982
- State v. Hale 641 P.2d 1288 Ariz. 1982
- State v. Kelly 636 P.2d 153 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
- State v. Kelly 636 P.2d 153 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1981
- State v. SUPERIOR CT. OF STATE OF ARIZ., ETC. 629 P.2d 992 Ariz. 1981
- State v. SUPERIOR CT. OF STATE OF ARIZ., ETC. 629 P.2d 992 Ariz. 1981
- State v. Hale 641 P.2d 1293 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
- State v. Hale 641 P.2d 1293 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1981
- State v. Smith 593 P.2d 281 Ariz. 1979
- State v. Smith 593 P.2d 281 Ariz. 1979
- State v. Albert 565 P.2d 534 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
- State v. Albert 565 P.2d 534 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
- State v. Moody 560 P.2d 1272 Ariz. 1977
-
State v. Moody
560 P.2d 1272
Ariz. 1977
our Supreme Court said: “We are aware of the fact that affidavit disclosed that another informant had been ‘advised’ that appellant would not allow anyone to whom he was selling heroin to come to his home because ‘he kept large quantities of narcotics (heroin) *367 in his residence.’ This inform
- State v. Watson 550 P.2d 89 Ariz. 1976
-
State v. Watson
550 P.2d 89
Ariz. 1976
United States v. Lucarz, 430 F.2d 1051 (9th Cir. 1970).
- State v. Payne 544 P.2d 671 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
- State v. Payne 544 P.2d 671 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976