Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. MacUmber, 582 P.2d 162.

45 citing documents.

State v. Steinle 354 P.3d 408 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Krauch Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Krauch Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
State v. Macumber, 119 Ariz. 4 STATE v. KRAUCH Decision of the Court 516, 521
State v. Davolt 84 P.3d 456 Ariz. 2004
State v. Davolt 84 P.3d 456 Ariz. 2004
State v. Macumber, 119 Ariz. 516, 521
State v. Johnson 911 P.2d 527 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
State v. Johnson 911 P.2d 527 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1994
State v. Jackson 821 P.2d 1374 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
State v. Jackson 821 P.2d 1374 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1991
State v. Amaya-Ruiz 800 P.2d 1260 Ariz. 1990
State v. Amaya-Ruiz 800 P.2d 1260 Ariz. 1990
In Re the Appeal in Pima County Juvenile Severance Action No. S-2698 806 P.2d 892 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
In Re the Appeal in Pima County Juvenile Severance Action No. S-2698 806 P.2d 892 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1990
548 , 83 L.Ed.2d 436 (1984); , , cert.
State v. Romanosky 782 P.2d 693 Ariz. 1989
State v. Romanosky 782 P.2d 693 Ariz. 1989
State v. Smith 781 P.2d 601 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
State v. Smith 781 P.2d 601 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1989
Barrow v. Arizona Board of Regents 761 P.2d 145 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
Barrow v. Arizona Board of Regents 761 P.2d 145 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
State v. LaGrand 734 P.2d 563 Ariz. 1987
State v. LaGrand 734 P.2d 563 Ariz. 1987
548 , 83 L.Ed.2d 436 (1984); , , cert.
State v. Emery 688 P.2d 175 Ariz. 1984
State v. Emery 688 P.2d 175 Ariz. 1984
State v. Ashelman 671 P.2d 901 Ariz. 1983
State v. Ashelman 671 P.2d 901 Ariz. 1983
State v. Grijalva 667 P.2d 1336 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
State v. Grijalva 667 P.2d 1336 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
That rule provides that, “[a] statement tending to expose the declarant to criminal liability and offered to exculpate the accused is not admissible unless corroborating circumstances clearly indicate the trustworthiness of the statement.” The trial court, , cert.
State v. Ashelman 671 P.2d 912 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
State v. Ashelman 671 P.2d 912 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
State v. Williams 644 P.2d 889 Ariz. 1982
State v. Williams 644 P.2d 889 Ariz. 1982
State v. Macumber, *158 , , cert.
State v. Nelson 633 P.2d 391 Ariz. 1981
State v. Nelson 633 P.2d 391 Ariz. 1981
State v. Schad 633 P.2d 366 Ariz. 1981
State v. Schad 633 P.2d 366 Ariz. 1981
State v. Neese 616 P.2d 959 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
State v. Neese 616 P.2d 959 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1980
State v. Williams 610 P.2d 72 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
State v. Williams 610 P.2d 72 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1980
State v. Fierro 603 P.2d 74 Ariz. 1979
State v. Fierro 603 P.2d 74 Ariz. 1979
State v. Tulipane 596 P.2d 695 Ariz. 1979
State v. Tulipane 596 P.2d 695 Ariz. 1979
State Ex Rel. Hyder v. Hughes 580 P.2d 722 Ariz. 1978
State Ex Rel. Hyder v. Hughes 580 P.2d 722 Ariz. 1978
If prejudice is claimed after a trial and conviction, it will then become the court’s duty to look at the circumstances of the case, , and determine the fairness thereof.