Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Childs, 553 P.2d 1192.
- State v. Rose 589 P.2d 5 Ariz. 1978
- State v. Rose 589 P.2d 5 Ariz. 1978
-
State v. Siqueiros
591 P.2d 557
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
The facts, when viewed in the light most favorable to support the trial court’s ruling on the motion to suppress, , , , where the disputed evidence had never been placed inside the garbage can.
- State v. Heberly 587 P.2d 260 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
- State v. Heberly 587 P.2d 260 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
- State v. Shinault 584 P.2d 1204 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
-
State v. Shinault
584 P.2d 1204
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
1 Viewed in the light most favorable to support the trial court’s ruling, , the facts pertinent to the suppression motions are as follows.
- State v. Carter 578 P.2d 991 Ariz. 1978
- State v. Carter 578 P.2d 991 Ariz. 1978
- State v. Gaddy 578 P.2d 1023 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
- State v. Gaddy 578 P.2d 1023 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
- State v. Bailes 578 P.2d 1011 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
-
State v. Bailes
578 P.2d 1011
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
Examining the evidence in the light most favorable to supporting the trial court’s ruling on the motion to suppress, , we find no error.
- State v. Pittman 574 P.2d 1290 Ariz. 1978
- State v. Pittman 574 P.2d 1290 Ariz. 1978
- State v. Duran 575 P.2d 1265 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
- State v. Duran 575 P.2d 1265 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
- State v. Purcell 572 P.2d 439 Ariz. 1977
- State v. Purcell 572 P.2d 439 Ariz. 1977
- State v. Lacquey 571 P.2d 1027 Ariz. 1977
-
State v. Lacquey
571 P.2d 1027
Ariz. 1977
Viewing the facts in a light most favorable to sustain the court’s judgment and the jury’s verdict, , the record fails to support a finding of premeditation and deliberation.
- State v. Green 570 P.2d 755 Ariz. 1977
-
State v. Green
570 P.2d 755
Ariz. 1977
Viewing the facts in a light most favorable to upholding the trial court’s actions, , a number of different acts were alleged in the indictment as overt acts.
- State v. Myers 569 P.2d 1351 Ariz. 1977
- State v. Garner 569 P.2d 1341 Ariz. 1977
- State v. Garner 569 P.2d 1341 Ariz. 1977
- State v. Myers 569 P.2d 1351 Ariz. 1977
- State v. Rowe 569 P.2d 225 Ariz. 1977
-
State v. Rowe
569 P.2d 225
Ariz. 1977
Viewing the facts in a light most favorable to upholding the trial court’s actions, , we assume that the sentence imposed was not the product of motivations amounting to an abuse of discretion.
- State v. Stoneman 566 P.2d 1340 Ariz. 1977
- State v. Stoneman 566 P.2d 1340 Ariz. 1977
- State v. Broadfoot 566 P.2d 685 Ariz. 1977
- State v. Broadfoot 566 P.2d 685 Ariz. 1977
- State v. Cook 564 P.2d 877 Ariz. 1977
- State v. Cook 564 P.2d 877 Ariz. 1977
- Hopper v. Industrial Commission 558 P.2d 927 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
- Hopper v. Industrial Commission 558 P.2d 927 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976