Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Stauffer, 536 P.2d 1044.

36 citing documents.

State v. Young Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
State v. Young Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2024
(quoting Ashe v. Swenson, 397 U.S. 436, 443 (1970)).
Crosby-Garbotz v. Fell 418 P.3d 1112 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2017
Crosby-Garbotz v. Fell 418 P.3d 1112 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2017
1189 , 25 L.Ed.2d 469 (1970), and State v. Stauffer
State v. Aguilar 267 P.3d 1193 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
State v. Aguilar 267 P.3d 1193 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2011
1623 , 10 L.Ed.2d 726 (1963)
State v. Whelan 91 P.3d 1011 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
State v. Whelan 91 P.3d 1011 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
Collateral Estoppel ¶ 12 Our cases hold that “[collateral estoppel is incorporated in the Fifth Amendment guarantee against double jeopardy binding on the states through the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.” , (citing Ashe, 397 U.S. at 443 , 90 S.Ct.
Fitzgerald v. Superior Court 845 P.2d 465 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
Fitzgerald v. Superior Court 845 P.2d 465 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1992
1189, 1194 , 25 L.Ed.2d 469 (1970)
State v. Waicelunas 672 P.2d 968 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
State v. Waicelunas 672 P.2d 968 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1983
State v. Jimenez 634 P.2d 950 Ariz. 1981
State v. Jimenez 634 P.2d 950 Ariz. 1981
State v. DeWoody 595 P.2d 1026 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
State v. DeWoody 595 P.2d 1026 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
Zisser v. State 592 P.2d 383 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
Matter of One 1974 Mercedes Benz, Etc. 592 P.2d 383 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
Matter of One 1974 Mercedes Benz, Etc. 592 P.2d 383 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
1189, 1194 , 25 L.Ed.2d 469, 475 (1970); [1]
Zisser v. State 592 P.2d 383 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
1189, 1194 , 25 L.Ed.2d 469, 475 (1970); 1
State v. Heberly 587 P.2d 260 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
State v. Heberly 587 P.2d 260 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
State v. Sepulveda 584 P.2d 1169 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
State v. Sepulveda 584 P.2d 1169 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
State v. Mead 584 P.2d 572 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
State v. Mead 584 P.2d 572 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
State v. Dupuy 568 P.2d 1049 Ariz. 1977
State v. Dupuy 568 P.2d 1049 Ariz. 1977
State Ex Rel. Hyder v. SUPERIOR COURT, ETC. 560 P.2d 1244 Ariz. 1977
State Ex Rel. Hyder v. SUPERIOR COURT, ETC. 560 P.2d 1244 Ariz. 1977
State v. Wilson 548 P.2d 23 Ariz. 1976
State v. Wilson 548 P.2d 23 Ariz. 1976
“There is probable cause if the arresting officer has a sufficient knowledge of facts and circumstances to justify a man of prudence and reasonable caution to believe that a felony has been committed (citations omitted).”
State v. Sardo 543 P.2d 1138 Ariz. 1975
State v. Sardo 543 P.2d 1138 Ariz. 1975
State v. Miller 537 P.2d 965 Ariz. 1975
State v. Miller 537 P.2d 965 Ariz. 1975
1879 (1949); State v. Stauffer, Ariz.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by