Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Gomez, 540 P.2d 1224.
- State v. Robinson 869 P.2d 1196 Ariz. 1994
-
State v. Robinson
869 P.2d 1196
Ariz. 1994
State v. Heasley, 23 Ariz.App.
- State v. Cereceres 800 P.2d 1 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
- State v. Cereceres 800 P.2d 1 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1990
- State v. Ojeda 769 P.2d 1006 Ariz. 1989
- State v. Ojeda 769 P.2d 1006 Ariz. 1989
- State v. Ojeda 764 P.2d 350 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
- State v. Ojeda 764 P.2d 350 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1988
- State v. Williams 593 P.2d 896 Ariz. 1979
- State v. Williams 593 P.2d 896 Ariz. 1979
- State v. Warde 570 P.2d 766 Ariz. 1977
-
State v. Warde
570 P.2d 766
Ariz. 1977
the action of this court confirmed that trial judges in sentencing must consider the time spent in custody prior to sentence.
- State v. Rivera 569 P.2d 1347 Ariz. 1977
- State v. Rivera 569 P.2d 1347 Ariz. 1977
- State v. Rios 562 P.2d 385 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
- State v. Rios 562 P.2d 385 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
- State v. Hadley 559 P.2d 206 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
-
State v. Hadley
559 P.2d 206
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
Thus, he concludes, , and Rule 27.7(d), Arizona Rules of Criminal Procedure, 17 A.R.S., because it was revoked for violation of a condition for which he had never received a written copy.
- State v. Espinoza 555 P.2d 318 Ariz. 1976
- State v. Espinoza 555 P.2d 318 Ariz. 1976
- State v. Baylis 553 P.2d 675 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
- State v. Baylis 553 P.2d 675 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
- State v. White 541 P.2d 1156 Ariz. 1975
- State v. White 541 P.2d 1156 Ariz. 1975
- State v. Jameson 541 P.2d 912 Ariz. 1975
- State v. Jameson 541 P.2d 912 Ariz. 1975