Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Miller, 537 P.2d 965.

39 citing documents.

Sandoval v. Tempe Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
Sandoval v. Tempe Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2015
7 SANDOVAL v. TEMPE Decision of the Court would a reasonably careful and prudent police [agency] in the same circumstances.” (alteration in original) (quoting Austin, 140 Ariz. at 581-82, 684 P.2d at 153-54); (“A policeman has the duty to be alert to suspicious circumstances and to investigate if necessary, provided that he is acting within constitutional limitations.”); ¶ 14, (finding that although a police officer
In Re Tiffany O. 174 P.3d 282 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2007
State v. Watkins 88 P.3d 1174 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
State v. Watkins 88 P.3d 1174 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2004
(“A policeman has the duty to be alert to suspicious circumstances and to investigate if necessary, provided that he is acting within constitutional limitations.”) (citation omitted).
State v. Valle 996 P.2d 125 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
State v. Valle 996 P.2d 125 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2000
State v. Smith 762 P.2d 509 Ariz. 1988
State v. Smith 762 P.2d 509 Ariz. 1988
State v. De Nistor 694 P.2d 237 Ariz. 1985
State v. De Nistor 694 P.2d 237 Ariz. 1985
State v. Mincey 636 P.2d 637 Ariz. 1981
State v. Mincey 636 P.2d 637 Ariz. 1981
State v. Herber 598 P.2d 1033 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
State v. Herber 598 P.2d 1033 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
State v. Watkins 592 P.2d 1278 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
State v. Watkins 592 P.2d 1278 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1979
the court stated: *15 “It is required by Aguilar v. Texas, 378 U.S. 108 , 84 S.Ct.
State v. Woods 589 P.2d 430 Ariz. 1979
State v. Woods 589 P.2d 430 Ariz. 1979
Probable cause to support a warrantless arrest exists “if the arresting officer knows facts and circumstances sufficient to justify the belief of a reasonable and prudent man that a crime has been committed by the individual arrested.”
State v. Ray 598 P.2d 994 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
State v. Ray 598 P.2d 994 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
State v. Hansen 573 P.2d 896 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
State v. Hansen 573 P.2d 896 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
State v. Dupuy 568 P.2d 1049 Ariz. 1977
State v. Dupuy 568 P.2d 1049 Ariz. 1977
we said: “A person may be arrested without a warrant if there is probable cause to be *155 lieve that a felony has been committed and that he is the person responsible.
State v. LaBarre 561 P.2d 764 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
State v. LaBarre 561 P.2d 764 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
State v. Wilder, 22 Ariz.App.
State v. Rascon 562 P.2d 731 Ariz. 1977
State v. Rascon 562 P.2d 731 Ariz. 1977
§ 13-1403 (Supp.1973); P.2d 965 (1975).
State v. Hinkle 550 P.2d 115 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1976
State v. Hinkle 550 P.2d 115 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1976
State v. Dale 550 P.2d 83 Ariz. 1976
State v. Dale 550 P.2d 83 Ariz. 1976
State v. Belkin 549 P.2d 608 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1976
State v. Belkin 549 P.2d 608 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1976
State v. Clark 543 P.2d 1122 Ariz. 1975
State v. Clark 543 P.2d 1122 Ariz. 1975
State v. Goldsmith 542 P.2d 1098 Ariz. 1975
State v. Goldsmith 542 P.2d 1098 Ariz. 1975