Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Mitchell, 545 P.2d 49.
- State v. Terrazas 944 P.2d 1194 Ariz. 1997
- State v. Terrazas 930 P.2d 464 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
-
State v. Terrazas
930 P.2d 464
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1996
State v. Corcoran (Treadaway), , , , , 473-74 n. 3, , 233-34 n. 3 (App.1993); , , State v. Keith, 24 Ariz.App.
- State v. Armstrong 862 P.2d 230 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
- State v. Armstrong 862 P.2d 230 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1993
- State v. Pereida 825 P.2d 975 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1992
-
State v. Pereida
825 P.2d 975
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1992
Appellant also argues that the evidence was inadmissible because the proof was insufficient to take to the jury
- State v. Mendoza 823 P.2d 51 Ariz. 1992
- State v. Mendoza 823 P.2d 51 Ariz. 1992
- State v. Fierroa 804 P.2d 72 Ariz. 1990
- State v. Fierroa 804 P.2d 72 Ariz. 1990
- State v. Gamez 696 P.2d 1327 Ariz. 1985
- State v. Gamez 696 P.2d 1327 Ariz. 1985
- State v. LaGrand 674 P.2d 338 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
- State v. LaGrand 674 P.2d 338 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1983
- State v. Jackson 589 P.2d 1309 Ariz. 1979
- State v. Jackson 589 P.2d 1309 Ariz. 1979
- State v. Woods 589 P.2d 430 Ariz. 1979
-
State v. Woods
589 P.2d 430
Ariz. 1979
“More succinctly, the Arizona rule is that before the evidence of the separate crime or offense may be admitted, there must be evidence of that other crime substantial enough to take that case to a jury, State v. Mitchell, supra [ , ], although it need not be proof beyond a reasonable doubt.
- State v. Rose 589 P.2d 5 Ariz. 1978
- State v. Rose 589 P.2d 5 Ariz. 1978
- State v. Ferguson 586 P.2d 190 Ariz. 1978
- State v. Ferguson 586 P.2d 190 Ariz. 1978
- State v. Binford 584 P.2d 67 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
- State v. Binford 584 P.2d 67 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1978
- State v. Mosley 581 P.2d 238 Ariz. 1978
- State v. Mosley 581 P.2d 238 Ariz. 1978
- State Ex Rel. LaSota v. Corcoran 583 P.2d 229 Ariz. 1978
-
State Ex Rel. LaSota v. Corcoran
583 P.2d 229
Ariz. 1978
It is only necessary that, “the proof both as to the commission of another crime and its commission by the defendant, must be by ‘substantial evidence sufficient to take the case to a jury’.”
- State v. Myers 570 P.2d 1252 Ariz. 1977
- State v. Myers 570 P.2d 1252 Ariz. 1977
- State v. Marahrens 560 P.2d 1211 Ariz. 1977
- State v. Marahrens 560 P.2d 1211 Ariz. 1977
- State v. Strickland 558 P.2d 723 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
- State v. Strickland 558 P.2d 723 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
- State v. Mankel 555 P.2d 1124 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1976
-
State v. Mankel
555 P.2d 1124
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1976
See, , State v. Avriett, 25 Ariz.App.