Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Jordan, 614 P.2d 825.

95 citing documents.

State v. Snelling 236 P.3d 409 Ariz. 2010
State v. Snelling 236 P.3d 409 Ariz. 2010
“The death penalty may be imposed only if the state has proved the existence of at least one aggravating factor beyond a reasonable doubt,” Ramirez, 178 Ariz. at 128, 871 P.2d at 249, and we “will reduce a death penalty to life imprisonment where the evidence of aggravating factors is inconclusive,” 7 CONCLUSION ¶39 We affirm Snelling’s conviction for first degree murder.
State Ex Rel. Thomas v. Granville 123 P.3d 662 Ariz. 2005
State Ex Rel. Thomas v. Granville 123 P.3d 662 Ariz. 2005
State v. Murdaugh 97 P.3d 844 Ariz. 2004
State v. Murdaugh 97 P.3d 844 Ariz. 2004
State v. Viramontes 64 P.3d 188 Ariz. 2003
State v. Viramontes 64 P.3d 188 Ariz. 2003
State v. Viramontes 27 P.3d 809 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001
State v. Viramontes 27 P.3d 809 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001
State v. Estrada 18 P.3d 1253 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001
State v. Estrada 18 P.3d 1253 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 2001
State v. Gallegos 916 P.2d 1056 Ariz. 1996
State v. Gallegos 916 P.2d 1056 Ariz. 1996
In Gallegos I, we applied the definition of “intent” from State v. Jordan• “Generally, when a defendant acts with the knowledge that his behavior is substantially likely to cause a result[,] he is considered to intend that result.”
State v. Richmond 886 P.2d 1329 Ariz. 1994
State v. Richmond 886 P.2d 1329 Ariz. 1994
290 n. 5, , 832 n. 5, cert.
State v. Ramirez 871 P.2d 237 Ariz. 1994
State v. Ramirez 871 P.2d 237 Ariz. 1994
State v. Gallegos 870 P.2d 1097 Ariz. 1994
State v. Gallegos 870 P.2d 1097 Ariz. 1994
State v. Michael Apelt 861 P.2d 634 Ariz. 1993
State v. Rudi Apelt 861 P.2d 654 Ariz. 1993
State v. Rudi Apelt 861 P.2d 654 Ariz. 1993
State v. Michael Apelt 861 P.2d 634 Ariz. 1993
State v. West 862 P.2d 192 Ariz. 1993
State v. West 862 P.2d 192 Ariz. 1993
State v. Schurz 859 P.2d 156 Ariz. 1993
State v. Schurz 859 P.2d 156 Ariz. 1993
State v. Spencer 859 P.2d 146 Ariz. 1993
State v. Spencer 859 P.2d 146 Ariz. 1993
State v. Atwood 832 P.2d 593 Ariz. 1992
State v. Brewer 826 P.2d 783 Ariz. 1992
State v. Brewer 826 P.2d 783 Ariz. 1992
Defendant may present “additional evidence to show that the ‘disorder’ is capable of significantly impairing a person’s capacity.” Vickers, 129 Ariz. at 515-16 , 633 P.2d at 324-25
State v. Fierroa 804 P.2d 72 Ariz. 1990
State v. Fierroa 804 P.2d 72 Ariz. 1990
State v. Rockwell 775 P.2d 1069 Ariz. 1989
State v. Rockwell 775 P.2d 1069 Ariz. 1989
permits the use of such “prior” convictions under A.R.S.
State v. Prince 772 P.2d 1121 Ariz. 1989
State v. Prince 772 P.2d 1121 Ariz. 1989
State v. Stevens 764 P.2d 724 Ariz. 1988
State v. LaGrand 734 P.2d 563 Ariz. 1987
State v. LaGrand 734 P.2d 563 Ariz. 1987
State v. Rossi 706 P.2d 371 Ariz. 1985
State v. Rossi 706 P.2d 371 Ariz. 1985
State v. Smith 707 P.2d 289 Ariz. 1985
State v. Smith 707 P.2d 289 Ariz. 1985
It is true that the state must prove the existence of aggravating circumstances beyond a reasonable doubt, , , cert.
State v. Gerlaugh 698 P.2d 694 Ariz. 1985
State v. Gerlaugh 698 P.2d 694 Ariz. 1985
State v. Gillies, supra, 135 Ariz. at 515, 662 P.2d at 1022 ; , -32 (1980).
State v. Poland 698 P.2d 183 Ariz. 1985
State v. Poland 698 P.2d 183 Ariz. 1985
cert, denied, 449 U.S. 986 , 101 S.Ct.