DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Jordan, 672 P.2d 169.

28 citing documents.

  • State v. Mendoza 455 P.3d 705 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
  • State v. Mendoza 455 P.3d 705 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2019
    –09 (1983) (holding judges may not participate in settlement discussions).
  • State v. Rossi 830 P.2d 797 Ariz. 1992
  • State v. Rossi 830 P.2d 797 Ariz. 1992
    This court rejected the argument
  • State v. Vickers 768 P.2d 1177 Ariz. 1989
  • State v. Vickers 768 P.2d 1177 Ariz. 1989
  • State v. Correll 715 P.2d 721 Ariz. 1986
  • State v. Correll 715 P.2d 721 Ariz. 1986
  • State v. Rossi 706 P.2d 371 Ariz. 1985
  • State v. Rossi 706 P.2d 371 Ariz. 1985
  • State v. Smith 707 P.2d 289 Ariz. 1985
  • State v. Smith 707 P.2d 289 Ariz. 1985
    (Jordan III)] State v. Gretzler, supra.
  • State v. Bracy 703 P.2d 464 Ariz. 1985
  • State v. Bracy 703 P.2d 464 Ariz. 1985
    2259 , 72 L.Ed.2d 863 (1982) (adequate definition of “heinous, cruel, or depraved”); , (death penalty not unconstitutional because it requires death sentence if one or more aggravating circumstances outweigh mitigating factors).
  • State v. Jordan 697 P.2d 323 Ariz. 1985
  • State v. Jordan 697 P.2d 323 Ariz. 1985
  • State v. Carriger 692 P.2d 991 Ariz. 1984
  • State v. Carriger 692 P.2d 991 Ariz. 1984
    Carriger argues, , that he has a right to a jury finding that the statutory aggravating circumstances exist.
  • State v. Smith 687 P.2d 1265 Ariz. 1984
  • State v. Smith 687 P.2d 1265 Ariz. 1984
    in which we found the murder not to be especially heinous, cruel, or depraved.
  • State v. Chaney 686 P.2d 1265 Ariz. 1984
  • State v. Chaney 686 P.2d 1265 Ariz. 1984
  • State v. Emery 688 P.2d 175 Ariz. 1984
  • State v. Emery 688 P.2d 175 Ariz. 1984
    (court’s finding in prior appeal that petitioner killed and intended to kill satisfied Enmund requirements; no need to remand for resentencing).
  • State v. James 685 P.2d 1293 Ariz. 1984
  • State v. James 685 P.2d 1293 Ariz. 1984
    James argues, , that he has a right to a jury finding that the statutory aggravating circumstances exist.
  • State v. Harding 687 P.2d 1247 Ariz. 1984
  • State v. Harding 687 P.2d 1247 Ariz. 1984
    All but one of those issues have been addressed by this court before in State v. *500 Jordan, , -08 , -15 (1983)