Cited by
Opinions in Arizona that cite State v. Barnett, 540 P.2d 682.
- State v. Roberts 612 P.2d 1055 Ariz. 1980
- State v. Roberts 612 P.2d 1055 Ariz. 1980
- State v. Gretzler 612 P.2d 1023 Ariz. 1980
-
State v. Gretzler
612 P.2d 1023
Ariz. 1980
State v. Armenta, 25 Ariz.App.
- State v. Bruce 610 P.2d 55 Ariz. 1980
- State v. Bruce 610 P.2d 55 Ariz. 1980
- State v. Lawrence 599 P.2d 754 Ariz. 1979
- State v. Lawrence 599 P.2d 754 Ariz. 1979
- State v. Johnson 594 P.2d 514 Ariz. 1979
- State v. Johnson 594 P.2d 514 Ariz. 1979
- State v. Stone 594 P.2d 558 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
- State v. Stone 594 P.2d 558 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1979
- State v. Acree 588 P.2d 836 Ariz. 1978
- State v. Acree 588 P.2d 836 Ariz. 1978
- State v. White 576 P.2d 138 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
- State v. White 576 P.2d 138 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 2 1978
- State v. Keller 562 P.2d 1070 Ariz. 1977
- State v. Keller 562 P.2d 1070 Ariz. 1977
- State v. Sims 560 P.2d 810 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
- State v. Sims 560 P.2d 810 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1977
- State v. Gallegos 556 P.2d 1141 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
- State v. Gallegos 556 P.2d 1141 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
- State v. Tucker 557 P.2d 160 Ariz. 1976
- State v. Tucker 557 P.2d 160 Ariz. 1976
- State v. Strickland 558 P.2d 723 Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
-
State v. Strickland
558 P.2d 723
Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 1976
our Supreme Court stated: “The detailed requirements of Rule 8.5 are in sharp contrast to the discretionary nature of its predecessor, Rules 241 to 249, and were designed to prevent infringement of an accused’s right to a speedy trial by improper use of a continuance as ‘excluded period’ under R
- State v. Gaines 549 P.2d 574 Ariz. 1976
- State v. Gaines 549 P.2d 574 Ariz. 1976